Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 488 (101st)

Providing for consideration of the conference report on the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 310) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 October 1990

Last action

4 October 1990 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Derrick, Butler C. [D-SC-3]

Subjects

Taxation, Budget

Source updated

7 February 2024

Taxation · Budget

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of the conference report on H. Con. Res. 310 (congressional budget).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 October 1990

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 173.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 2 October 1990

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H. Con. Res. 310 with 2 hours 0 of general debate. The conference report shall be considered as having been read when called up for consideration. Following disposition of the conference report, no motion with respect to disposition of H. Con. Res. 310 shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. The allocations of spending and credit responsibility to the committees of the House shall be considered to be the allocations required to be printed in the joint statement of managers pursuant to sec. 302(a) of the Budget Act. Rule XLIX shall not apply with respect to conference report adoption.

    Source: Floor

  3. 2 October 1990

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-794, by Mr. Derrick.

    Source: Committee

  4. 2 October 1990

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 101-794, by Mr. Derrick.

    Source: Committee

  5. 2 October 1990

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 4 October 1990

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  7. 4 October 1990

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 339 - 94 (Roll no. 420).

    Source: Floor

  8. 4 October 1990

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 339 - 94 (Roll no. 420).

    Source: Floor

  9. 4 October 1990

    Passed

    On ordering the previous question Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  10. 4 October 1990

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  11. 4 October 1990

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 2 October 1990

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.