Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 499 (119th)

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4) to rescind certain budget authority proposed to be rescinded in special messages transmitted to the Congress by the President on June 3, 2025, in accordance with section 1012(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, and for other purposes.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

11 June 2025

Last action

11 June 2025 · Reported

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]

Subjects

Budget

Source updated

11 July 2026

Budget

Records

Official resolution H.Res. 499 (119th) from United States at United States Congress. Dated 11 June 2025. Status: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection..

Timeline

  1. 11 June 2025

    Introduced

    Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4) to rescind certain budget authority proposed to be rescinded in special messages transmitted to the Congress by the President on June 3, 2025, in accordance with section 1012(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, and for other purposes.

    Source: HRES

  2. 11 June 2025

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  3. 11 June 2025

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 207 (Roll no. 165). (text: CR H2639)

    Source: Floor

  4. 11 June 2025

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 207 (Roll no. 165). (text: CR H2639)

    Source: Floor

  5. 11 June 2025

    Vote

    On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 204 (Roll no. 164).

    Source: Floor

  6. 11 June 2025

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 499.

    Source: Floor

  7. 11 June 2025

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2639-2647)

    Source: Floor

  8. 11 June 2025

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 33.

    Source: Calendars

  9. 11 June 2025

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4 with 1 hour of general debate. Motion to recommit allowed. Bill is closed to amendments.

    Source: Floor

  10. 11 June 2025

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-152, by Ms. Foxx.

    Source: Committee

  11. 11 June 2025

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-152, by Ms. Foxx.

    Source: Committee

Votes

11 June 2025 · passed · On Agreeing to the Resolution · Passed · Official source

Yes 213 · No 207 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 12

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

11 June 2025 · passed · On Ordering the Previous Question · Passed · Official source

Yes 210 · No 204 · Abstain — · Absent/not voting 18

Showing the first 4 recorded positions. Vote totals above are complete.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

2 official files

Engrossed in House

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Volledige documentvertaling met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House

    Engrossed in House · EN · 11 June 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Reported in House

    Reported in House · EN · 11 June 2025

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Volledige documentvertaling met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.