Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 522 (102nd)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4312) to amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with respect to bilingual election requirements.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

22 July 1992

Last action

23 July 1992 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Wheat, Alan [D-MO-5]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2024

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 4312 (voting materials language).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 22 July 1992

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 176.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 22 July 1992

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4312 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(4) of rule XI are waived. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Measure will be read by section. Specified amendments are in order. No further amendment shall be in order unless printed in the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII prior to the beginning of consideration of the bill. Debate on each amendment and amendments thereto, shall not exceed 20 minutes.

    Source: Floor

  3. 22 July 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-686, by Mr. Wheat.

    Source: Committee

  4. 22 July 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-686, by Mr. Wheat.

    Source: Committee

  5. 22 July 1992

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 23 July 1992

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  7. 23 July 1992

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  8. 23 July 1992

    Passed

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  9. 23 July 1992

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.

    Source: Floor

  10. 23 July 1992

    Floor

    The previous question was ordered without objection.

    Source: Floor

  11. 23 July 1992

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 22 July 1992

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.