Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · HRES

H.Res. 527 (102nd)

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 5620) making supplemental appropriations, transfers, and rescissions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1992, and for other purposes.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

23 July 1992

Last action

28 July 1992 · Passed

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10]

Subjects

Taxation

Source updated

7 February 2024

Taxation

Summary

Sets forth the rule for the consideration of H.R. 5620 (supplemental appropriations).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 July 1992

    Calendars

    Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 178.

    Source: Calendars

  2. 23 July 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-707, by Mr. Bonior.

    Source: Committee

  3. 23 July 1992

    Reported

    The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-707, by Mr. Bonior.

    Source: Committee

  4. 23 July 1992

    Floor

    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 5620 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. All points of order against the bill and against its consideration are waived. The bill shall be considered as read through page 21, line 11, and shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule for a period not to exceed two hours. Bill is open to amendments. Within the two hour period, debate on title III of the bill and any amendments thereto may not exceed 30 minutes. If such two hour period is exhausted, the disposition of any questions then pending and the reading of the last two lines of the bill shall constitute the conclusion of the bill for amendment.

    Source: Floor

  5. 23 July 1992

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 28 July 1992

    Vote

    On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 230 - 174 (Roll no. 324).

    Source: Floor

  7. 28 July 1992

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 230 - 174 (Roll no. 324).

    Source: Floor

  8. 28 July 1992

    Vote

    On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 207 - 199 (Roll No. 323).

    Source: Floor

  9. 28 July 1992

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate.

    Source: Floor

  10. 28 July 1992

    Floor

    Considered as privileged matter.

    Source: Floor

  11. 28 July 1992

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

3 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 23 July 1992

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.