Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3244) to combat trafficking of persons, especially into the sex trade, slavery, and slavery-like conditions in the United States and countries around the world through prevention, through prosecution and enforcement against traffickers, and through protection and assistance to victims of trafficking.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

5 October 2000

Last action

6 October 2000 · Floor

Status

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Summary

Waives points of order against consideration of the conference report on H.R. 3244 (prevention of trafficking of persons).

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

5 October 2000
Floor
Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 3244 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions.
Source: Floor
5 October 2000
Reported
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-942, by Ms. Pryce (OH).
Source: Committee
5 October 2000
Calendars
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 300.
Source: Calendars
5 October 2000
Reported
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 106-942, by Ms. Pryce (OH).
Source: Committee
5 October 2000
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
6 October 2000
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
6 October 2000
Vote
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 356 - 28 (Roll no. 517). (consideration: CR H9029-9036; text: CR H9029)
Source: Floor
6 October 2000
Vote
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 356 - 28 (Roll no. 517).(consideration: CR H9029-9036; text: CR H9029)
Source: Floor
6 October 2000
Floor
The previous question was ordered without objection.
Source: Floor
6 October 2000
Floor
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 613.
Source: Floor
6 October 2000
Floor
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H9029-9036)
Source: Floor

No vote records are attached yet.

5 official files

Engrossed in House (text)

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Vertaal naar

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Engrossed in House (text)
Engrossed in House · EN · 6 October 2000
View Download Open at official source
Engrossed in House (PDF)
Engrossed in House · EN · 6 October 2000
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (text)
Reported in House · EN · 5 October 2000
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (PDF)
Reported in House · EN · 5 October 2000
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 5 October 2000
Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.