Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SCONRES

S.Con.Res. 33 (102nd)

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress that employers resume normal business travel and tourism-related businesses intensify efforts to promote travel both to and within the United States.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

25 April 1991

Last action

25 April 1991 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Sponsors

Sen. Burns, Conrad R. [R-MT]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Expresses the sense of the Congress that employers resume normal business travel that was suspended during the Persian Gulf War and that travel and tourism-related businesses intensify efforts to promote travel both to and within the United States.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 April 1991

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Commerce.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 25 April 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 25 April 1991

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.