Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SCONRES

S.Con.Res. 51 (101st)

A concurrent resolution in support of human rights and democracy in Hong Kong.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

23 June 1989

Last action

23 June 1989 · Introduced

Status

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

Sponsors

Sen. Hatfield, Mark O. [R-OR]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Urges the British Government to ensure direct elections in 1991 and 1994 to the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. Calls upon the President to communicate to the People's Republic of China and the British Government the importance the United States attaches to the democratic and human rights of Hong Kong's citizens and the retention of Hong Kong's capitalist system.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 23 June 1989

    Introduced

    Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 23 June 1989

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

2 official files

Introduced in Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in Senate (text)

    Introduced in Senate · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Introduced in Senate

    summary · EN · 23 June 1989

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.