Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 104 (93rd)

A resolution to express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State shall not renegotiate the present North Pacific Fur Seal Convention.

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 April 1973

Last action

18 April 1973 · Introduced

Status

Referred to Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

Sponsors

Sen. Abourezk, James [D-SD], Sen. Tunney, John V. [D-CA]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Makes it the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State shall not renegotiate the present North Pacific Fur Seal Convention and that it should be allowed to expire in 1976. Makes it the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State should immediately notify the other parties to the convention that the United States does not intend to extend its life beyond 1976. Makes it the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of State should immediately initiate negotiations with the parties to the convention and any other interested States for the purpose of obtaining an international agreement or ageements to ban all killing of North Pacific fur seals whether on the Pribilof Islands or on the high seas.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 April 1973

    Introduced

    Referred to Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 18 April 1973

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.