PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 325 (100th)

An original resolution authorizing supplemental expenditures by the Committee on Rules and Administration.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

19 November 1987

Last action

19 December 1987 · Vote

Status

Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 64-22. Record Vote No: 417.

Sponsors

Sen. Ford, Wendell H. [D-KY]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Amends Senate Resolution 80, 100th Congress, to increase the authorized expenditures of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 17 November 1987

    Reported

    Committee on Rules ordered to be reported an original measure.

    Source: Committee

  2. 19 November 1987

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 449.

    Source: Calendars

  3. 19 November 1987

    Reported

    Committee on Rules. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Ford. With written report No. 100-228.

    Source: Committee

  4. 19 November 1987

    Reported

    Committee on Rules. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Ford. With written report No. 100-228.

    Source: Committee

  5. 19 November 1987

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  6. 19 December 1987

    Vote

    Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 64-22. Record Vote No: 417.

    Source: Floor

  7. 19 December 1987

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 64-22. Record Vote No: 417.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.