United States · Resolution · SRES
S.Res. 329 (101st)
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the effect of a sequestration order on conservation reserve contracts.
Introduced
27 September 1990
Last action
27 September 1990 · Introduced
Status
Referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Sponsors
Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD], Sen. Burdick, Quentin N. [D-ND], Sen. Conrad, Kent [D-ND]
Subjects
Agriculture
Source updated
14 January 2025
Summary
Expresses the sense of the Senate that any sequestration order issued under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act) should not affect any conservation reserve contract under the Food Security Act of 1985.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
27 September 1990
Introduced
Referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
Source: IntroReferral
27 September 1990
Introduced
Introduced in Senate
Source: IntroReferral
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
- Introduced in Senate · undated · Official file
Documents
2 official files
Introduced in Senate (text)
Introduced in Senate · EN
Introduced in Senate
summary · EN · 27 September 1990
Sponsors
- Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD] · D · Sponsor
- Sen. Burdick, Quentin N. [D-ND] · D · Sponsor
- Sen. Conrad, Kent [D-ND] · D · Sponsor
- · ssga00 · Standing
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/senate-resolution/329
- Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/101/sres/329
- us · 101-sres-329 · source updated 14 January 2025