PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 36 (95th)

A resolution providing for the establishment of a special committee to propose a code of conduct.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

18 January 1977

Last action

Status

Measure passed Senate.

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

1 August 2024

Summary

Establishes a temporary Special Committee on Official Conduct. Directs the special committee to conduct a complete study of all matters relating to standards of conduct of Members, officers, and employees of the Senate in the performance of their official duties, and to recommend to the Senate a Code of Official Conduct for Members, officers, and employees of the Senate. Requires such study and recommended Code to include, but not be limited to, standards for: (1) annual public disclosure of income, assets, debts, gifts, and other financial items; (2) restrictions on, or the elimination of, outside income from honoraria, legal fees, gifts, and other sources of financial or in-kind remuneration; (3) conflicts of interest arising out of investments in securities, commodities, real estate, or other sources, (4) office accounts, and excess campaign contributions; (5) Senate travel; and (6) engagement in business or professional activities or employment, or other remunerative activities, so as to avoid any conflict with the conscientious performance of official duties. Sets forth the procedure to be used when the Senate considers the resolution reported by the special committee on March 1, 1977.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.