PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 60 (109th)

A resolution supporting democratic reform in Moldova and urging the Government of Moldova to ensure a democratic and fair election process for the March 6, 2005, parliamentary elections.

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

17 February 2005

Last action

Status

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1689-1692; text as passed Senate: CR S1689; text of measure as introduced: CR S1681-1682)

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 April 2025

Summary

Welcomes the strong United States-Moldova relationship. Recognizes that a precondition for Moldova's full integration into the Western community of nations is the establishment of a democratic political system in Moldova. Supports the independence and territorial integrity of Moldova. Urges the Government of Moldova to ensure: (1) the full transparency of the March 2005 parliamentary elections; (2) the right to vote for all citizens of Moldova; (3) access by all parties and candidates to print, radio, television, and Internet media; and (4) the right of opposition candidates and workers to engage in campaigning free of discrimination and intimidation. Pledges the Senate's support to the people of Moldova for: (1) a democratic system; (2) a free market economy, (3) a secure independence; and (4) Moldova as a full member of the Western community of democracies.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

4 official files

Agreed to Senate (text)

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.