PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Resolution · SRES

S.Res. 93 (97th)

A resolution authorizing the printing of additional copies of part 1 of the Senate report entitled "Developments in Aging: 1980".

passedUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

12 March 1981

Last action

12 May 1981 · Passed

Status

Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

Sponsors

Sen. Heinz, John [R-PA], Sen. Chiles, Lawton [D-FL]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 January 2025

Summary

Authorizes the printing, for the use of the Special Committee on Aging, of part I of the report entitled "Developments in Aging: 1980."

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 March 1981

    Introduced

    Referred to Senate Committee on Rules.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 12 March 1981

    Introduced

    Introduced in Senate

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 30 April 1981

    Reported

    Committee on Rules. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

    Source: Committee

  4. 6 May 1981

    Calendars

    Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Regular Orders. Calendar No. 69.

    Source: Calendars

  5. 6 May 1981

    Reported

    Committee on Rules. Reported to Senate by Senator Mathias favorably without amendment. With written report No. 97-52.

    Source: Committee

  6. 6 May 1981

    Reported

    Committee on Rules. Reported to Senate by Senator Mathias favorably without amendment. With written report No. 97-52.

    Source: Committee

  7. 12 May 1981

    Passed

    Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

    Source: Floor

  8. 12 May 1981

    Passed

    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.

    Source: Floor

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

Related records

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.