Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Fragestunde

12/1633

Auffassung des BMWi über den Wechsel von Sachleistungs- zum Kostenerstattungsprinzip als Form zur Selbststeuerung; Untersuchungen über die Effizienz von Kostenerstattungsregelungen im Gesundheitswesen; Kostendämpfung durch Selbstbeteiligung (G-SIG: 12041696)

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

22 November 1991

Last action

22 November 1991 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Healthcare

Source updated

18 September 2026

Healthcare

Records

Official question 12/1633 from Germany at German Bundestag. Dated 22 November 1991. Status: Beantwortet.

Timeline

  1. 22 November 1991

    Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

    Auffassung des BMWi über den Wechsel von Sachleistungs- zum Kostenerstattungsprinzip als Form zur Selbststeuerung; Untersuchungen über die Effizienz von Kostenerstattungsregelungen im Gesundheitswesen; Kostendämpfung durch Selbstbeteiligung (G-SIG: 12041696)

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Related across the Repo ecosystem

Direct relationships are identifier-backed. Topic context means shared TopicMembership — not a citation and not causation.

Topic context

These topics include this entity via deterministic assignment. Co-membership is not a direct relationship.

  • Healthcare · RULE_BASED

    Precision title match for topic healthcare in DE

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.