PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage

17/14270

Selection criteria of states or territories in the Anti-Tax Evasion Act and the Anti-Tax Evasion Ordinance; Number of cases with extended obligations to cooperate and provide information as well as sanctions against taxpayers

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

1 January 2009

Last action

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 July 2022

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> In which states or territories have the Anti-Tax Evasion Act and the Anti-Tax Evasion Ordinance been applied to business relationships between taxpayers and financial institutions since they came into force (please state the respective period of application), and how does the federal government justify the selection of these states or territories?<br /> <br /> In how many cases Have there been any extended obligations to cooperate and provide information as well as sanctions against taxpayers under the Anti-Tax Evasion Act and the Anti-Tax Evasion Ordinance (please state the type and financial volume of the sanctions)?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.