Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage
17/14270
Selection criteria of states or territories in the Anti-Tax Evasion Act and the Anti-Tax Evasion Ordinance; Number of cases with extended obligations to cooperate and provide information as well as sanctions against taxpayers
Introduced
1 January 2009
Last action
—
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
26 July 2022
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> In which states or territories have the Anti-Tax Evasion Act and the Anti-Tax Evasion Ordinance been applied to business relationships between taxpayers and financial institutions since they came into force (please state the respective period of application), and how does the federal government justify the selection of these states or territories?<br /> <br /> In how many cases Have there been any extended obligations to cooperate and provide information as well as sanctions against taxpayers under the Anti-Tax Evasion Act and the Anti-Tax Evasion Ordinance (please state the type and financial volume of the sanctions)?
Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.