Germany · Question · Dringliche Frage
17/4421
Reasons for not shutting down the Grafenrheinfeld reactor after a crack was discovered in a main cooling line and for the delayed reporting of the incident to the BMU
Introduced
18 January 2011
Last action
—
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
26 July 2022
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What information or findings led the experts in the reactor safety department of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, BMU, to no longer demand the immediate shutdown of the Grafenrheinfeld reactor and the immediate replacement of the cracked component?<br /> <br /> How can it be that an incident that, in the opinion of Experts in the BMU's reactor safety department would have resulted in a possible "level 3 incident - reportable incident" or would have been categorized as such, which was classified as harmless by the operator Eon and was only reported to the BMU six months after it became known?
Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
17/4421
17/4421
Drucksache · DE · 18 January 2011
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.