Possible use of poison gas in Darfur

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> In its answer to my written question 24 on Bundestag printed paper 18/9927 of October 6, 2016, the Federal Government refers to the statements of the "significant international actors (also on site"), which have "significant doubts about the allegations made by Amnesty International" of the use of poison gas in Darfur, or which they consider to be "not plausible". in view of press reports according to which international actors are not represented in the region at all (see Der Tagesspiegel of October 31, 2016: "Berlin doubts reports about poison gas"), and what consequences would the federal government draw for cooperation with the Sudanese government, for example in the context of the so-called "Better Migration Management", if the use of poison gas were to occur confirm?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.