Financial reclaims by the job centers from people who have a guarantee obligation for refugees

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> How does the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs justify financial reclaims by the job centers in connection with the admission of Syrian refugees after declarations of commitment, often in the five-figure range, with regard to times after refugee recognition, especially in the federal states in which the interior ministries or authorities had declared to guarantors that the The guarantee obligation would end at the latest with refugee recognition (see www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/hessen-fluechtlingspaten-muessen-weiter-zahlen-a-1143032.html and Bundestag printed matter 18/5799), and to what extent does the Federal Government share the legal opinion of the Wiesbaden Administrative Court (see judgment of December 9, 2016, 4 K 545/16.WI), according to which a reason for challenge according to Section 119 Paragraph 1 Alternative 1 of the Civil Code of the German Civil Code (BGB) and a declaration of commitment can be retroactively invalid if those affected could assume, due to the unclear legal situation and/or based on information from state ministries, authorities or third parties, that the declaration of commitment would end in the event of refugee recognition and that they would otherwise not have made the declaration (please explain in detail)?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.