PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Mündliche Frage

18/6996

Different interpretations of the “good prospects of staying” at the Federal Employment Agency and the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

11 December 2015

Last action

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 July 2022

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Does the Federal Government agree with the Bremen Institute for Labor Market Research and Youth Career Assistance (BIAJ) that different interpretations of the "good prospects of staying" exist at the Federal Employment Agency (BA) and the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) (cf. http://biaj.de/archiv-kurzmitigungen/36-texte-biaj-kurzmitigungen/715-ba-und-bamf-zwei-abweiche-auffassungen-zu-mit-guter-bleibeperspektive-421-sgb-iii.html; please explain), and for what reason will the group of people "with good prospects of staying" be informed by the BA until December 31, 2015 about the possibility of taking part in language courses in accordance with Section 421 of the Third Book of the Social Security Code and by the BAMF about the possibility participation in integration courses is worded differently in the individual areas?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.