Noise protection measures after the expansion of a federal highway

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> According to the Federal Government's assessment, what legal options do affected citizens and municipalities have if, as in the example of Karlsbad-Muschelbach (Karlsruhe district, Baden-Württemberg, A8), after a legally valid planning approval decision (in the example from 2006) after the expansion of a federal motorway, it turns out a decade later that there is an increase in noise levels? As a result, necessary noise protection measures are not approved and built due to previous virtual calculation models in the planning approval decision (cf. the federal government's answer to my written questions 134 and 135 on Bundestag printed matter 19/1126 and https://bnn.de/lokales/ettlingen/absage-laermschutz-mutschelbach, August 30, 2016)?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.