Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage
19/16190
Expertise on the planned 7th amendment to the Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Husbandry Ordinance
Introduced
20 December 2019
Last action
—
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
26 July 2022
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What conclusions does the Federal Government draw from Dr. Davina Bruhn, who sees doubts about the constitutionality of the planned 7th amendment to the Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Husbandry Ordinance (www.media.4-paws.org./b/c/4/4/bc44f142c7880b6b9536d33b589d5fbf06a79061/Bruhn_Kurzexpertise_Neuregel_Sauenhalte.pdf) and why the federal government is planning to delete the passage in the TierSchNutzIV which stipulates that animals in crates should be able to stretch out their limbs while lying on their sides?
Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.