Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage
19/17884
Securities terms in various laws
Introduced
13 March 2020
Last action
—
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
26 July 2022
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Does the Federal Government know whether the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) does not consider the mandatory documentary embodiment of securities (paper form) in Germany based on the EU-wide regulatory definition of securities from Article 2 letter a of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (EU Prospectus Regulation) in conjunction with Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). no longer sees it as fully valid, but only currently has relevance with reference to the civil law definition of securities based on Section 793 of the Civil Code (BGB)?
Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/wertpapierbegriffe-in-verschiedenen-gesetzen/260695
- Open data entity: https://search.dip.bundestag.de/api/v1/vorgang/260695