PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage

19/17884

Securities terms in various laws

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

13 March 2020

Last action

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 July 2022

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Does the Federal Government know whether the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) does not consider the mandatory documentary embodiment of securities (paper form) in Germany based on the EU-wide regulatory definition of securities from Article 2 letter a of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (EU Prospectus Regulation) in conjunction with Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). no longer sees it as fully valid, but only currently has relevance with reference to the civil law definition of securities based on Section 793 of the Civil Code (BGB)?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.