Statement by the energy company Vattenfall on the 16th amendment to the Atomic Energy Act

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> To what extent does the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) disagree with the content of the statement received from the energy supply company Vattenfall as part of the state and association hearing on the 16th amendment to the Atomic Energy Act (please explain in as much detail as possible; see the Federal Government's answer to my oral question 23, plenary minutes 19/35, S. 3293), and in principle the BMU would welcome it if the Bundestag were to pursue the intention of adapting the present 16th amendment to the AtG before its adoption so that residual electricity quantities can no longer be transferred to nuclear power plants in the grid expansion area - if necessary with appropriate compensation regulations (cf. the federal government's answer to my second question about my oral statement, which is unclear to me in this regard Question 23, plenary minutes 19/35, S. 3294)?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.