Consequences of publishing an internal classification of the AfD as a “suspected case”

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What personnel and organizational consequences does the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) draw from the "piercing" of the information that the AfD is a "suspected case" to journalists, which the Cologne Administrative Court assessed as an "unjustifiable intervention that violates the constitutionally guaranteed equal opportunities for the parties" (cf. www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/rechtsextremismus-verdachtsfall-verfassungsschutz-beobachten-afd-nun-bundesweit-a-136d80ce-4549-4a23-8174-19ad70f20643?sara_ecid-soci_upd_KsBF0AFjflf0DZC xpPYDCQgQ1dEMph and www.vg-koeln.nrw.de/behoerde/presse/Pressreleases/09_050 32021/index.php)?

Machine translation from German. The official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.