PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage

21/1234

Possible route corridors for the Hanover-Bielefeld route

Original: Mögliche Trassenkorridore der Strecke Hannover-Bielefeld

Translated from German

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

15 August 2025

Last action

15 August 2025 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 September 2026

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> How does the federal government justify the fact that there is a contradiction in the statements made by the state government of North Rhine-Westphalia in its answer to question 1 of a small question on state parliament printed matter 18/13772 ("Is the state government aware that there are possible structural overlaps between the closure of the gap and in the variants of the planned possible route corridors?"), in which the State government answers: "The state government is aware of possible structural overlaps" and the federal government's answer to question 1 of the small question from the AfD parliamentary group on Bundestag printed paper 21/751 ("Which planning variants of the twelve route corridor variants selected by DB AG influence, according to information from the federal government, the realization of the L712n state road under construction between Bielefeld and Herford?"), which writes that there are "none", and which statement corresponds to the fact?

Discovery translation for search and reading. The original official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

  1. 15 August 2025

    Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

    Possible route corridors for the Hanover-Bielefeld route

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.