Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage
21/1234
Adjustments in the 2025 climate protection report regarding the mention of the Building Energy Act
Introduced
15 August 2025
Last action
15 August 2025 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
8 September 2026
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> How does the federal government justify the removal of the passage that the Building Energy Act (GEG), including the 65 percent rule, is the most effective instrument in the building sector, as explained in the draft report (https://table.media/assets/klimaschutzbericht_bmukn.pdf; S. 39), and will the federal government delete the 65 percent rule in the GEG, as passed on August 6, 2025 Climate protection report indicated (https://background.tagesspiegel.de/energie-und-klima/briefing/65-prozent-vorgabe-beim-heizen-fließ-aus-klimaschutzbericht), and if so, how does the federal government plan to achieve the sector goals in the building sector, and if no, why has the mention of the 65 percent rule in the GEG been deleted from the entire climate protection report?
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
15 August 2025
Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Adjustments in the 2025 climate protection report regarding the mention of the Building Energy Act
Source: BT
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/anpassungen-im-klimaschutzbericht-2025-hinsichtlich-der-erwahnung-des-gebaudeene/325112
- Open data entity: https://search.dip.bundestag.de/api/v1/vorgang/325112
- germany · 325112 · source updated 8 September 2026