PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage

21/1234

Adjustments in the 2025 climate protection report regarding the mention of the Building Energy Act

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

15 August 2025

Last action

15 August 2025 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 September 2026

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> How does the federal government justify the removal of the passage that the Building Energy Act (GEG), including the 65 percent rule, is the most effective instrument in the building sector, as explained in the draft report (https://table.media/assets/klimaschutzbericht_bmukn.pdf; S. 39), and will the federal government delete the 65 percent rule in the GEG, as passed on August 6, 2025 Climate protection report indicated (https://background.tagesspiegel.de/energie-und-klima/briefing/65-prozent-vorgabe-beim-heizen-fließ-aus-klimaschutzbericht), and if so, how does the federal government plan to achieve the sector goals in the building sector, and if no, why has the mention of the 65 percent rule in the GEG been deleted from the entire climate protection report?

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 15 August 2025

    Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

    Adjustments in the 2025 climate protection report regarding the mention of the Building Energy Act

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.