Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage
21/1831
Position on naming bans for plant-based meat alternatives
Introduced
26 September 2025
Last action
26 September 2025 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
1 September 2026
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What position did Germany represent in the Working Party on Agricultural Products of September 2, 2025 with regard to naming bans for plant-based meat alternatives (to include a part on names for meat and meat products in Annex VII) as part of the EU Commission's proposal for changes to the Common Market Organization (CMO) (Annex 1 to COM(2025) 553), and how does this position of the Federal Government relate to its own goals in the high-tech agenda Germany's aim to use and promote biotechnological potential for the production of health-promoting and sustainable foods and alternative proteins and to develop them as a sustainable pillar of our diet (Goal 3, S. 21) as well as the plan in the coalition agreement between the CDU, CSU and SPD to promote the market launch of sustainable alternative proteins (S. 43)?
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
26 September 2025
Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Position on naming bans for plant-based meat alternatives
Source: BT
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/position-zu-bezeichnungsverboten-fur-pflanzliche-fleischalternativen/327103
- Open data entity: https://search.dip.bundestag.de/api/v1/vorgang/327103
- germany · 327103 · source updated 1 September 2026