Hearing of a head of department of the BMAS at the Karlsruhe Social Court on the constitutionality of the adjustments to standard needs in SGB II

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> As I became aware, why did the head of the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs (BMAS) responsible for fundamental questions of basic security fail to appear for personal questioning in proceedings S 12 AS 2069/22 at the Karlsruhe Social Court, even though the court had announced an oral hearing on the constitutionality of the adjustments to standard requirements in Book II of the Social Security Code (SGB II) for the years 2021 to 2023, and how does the Federal Government assess the accusation? that the lack of cooperation by the BMAS is contributing to a delay in the question of whether Section 73 SGB II - basic security for job seekers - in the version of Article 1 number 5 of the law regulating an immediate supplement and a one-off payment in the social minimum security systems as well as amending the Financial Equalization Act and other laws of May 23, 2022 with effect from June 1, 2022 with the fundamental right to guarantee a humane minimum subsistence level from Article 1 paragraph 1 of the Basic Law in conjunction with the welfare state principle of Article 20 paragraph 1 of the Basic Law and the general principle of equality according to Article 3 paragraph 1 of the Basic Law?

Discovery translation for search and reading. The original official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

1. 26 September 2025

   Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

   Hearing of a head of department of the BMAS at the Karlsruhe Social Court on the constitutionality of the adjustments to standard needs in SGB II

   Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.