PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage

21/2387

Personnel failures in district headquarters, lock systems and ship lifts

openGermany· German Bundestag· DE

Introduced

24 October 2025

Last action

24 October 2025 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

Status

Beantwortet

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 August 2026

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Is the federal government sticking to its answer to my written question 170 on Bundestag printed paper 21/848 (quote: "In the years 2024 and 2025 there were no failures due to a lack of staffing in district headquarters, lock systems and ship lifts."), although the head of the Oberwesel district headquarters on the Middle Rhine and an employee of the General Directorate of Waterways and Shipping told the Bundestag member Alexis L. When Giersch and I asked when we visited the district headquarters on October 2, 2025, it was confirmed that there were staff shortages and therefore temporary non-occupancy at the district headquarters due to retirement, illness or a lack of young talent, and how does the federal government justify its answer at the time?

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 October 2025

    Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

    Personnel failures in district headquarters, lock systems and ship lifts

    Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.