Germany · Question · Schriftliche Frage
21/2387
Personnel failures in district headquarters, lock systems and ship lifts
Introduced
24 October 2025
Last action
24 October 2025 · Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Status
Beantwortet
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
28 August 2026
Summary
Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Is the federal government sticking to its answer to my written question 170 on Bundestag printed paper 21/848 (quote: "In the years 2024 and 2025 there were no failures due to a lack of staffing in district headquarters, lock systems and ship lifts."), although the head of the Oberwesel district headquarters on the Middle Rhine and an employee of the General Directorate of Waterways and Shipping told the Bundestag member Alexis L. When Giersch and I asked when we visited the district headquarters on October 2, 2025, it was confirmed that there were staff shortages and therefore temporary non-occupancy at the district headquarters due to retirement, illness or a lack of young talent, and how does the federal government justify its answer at the time?
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
24 October 2025
Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort
Personnel failures in district headquarters, lock systems and ship lifts
Source: BT
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
No documents linked.
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/personelle-ausfalle-in-revierzentralen-schleusenanlagen-und-schiffshebewerke/327719
- Open data entity: https://search.dip.bundestag.de/api/v1/vorgang/327719
- germany · 327719 · source updated 28 August 2026