Practice of the German Pension Insurance regarding coordination notes in procedural files

Summary

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What findings does the federal government have about the reporting in the "Berliner Zeitung" of December 11, 2025 ("Does the pension insurance favor the state - at the expense of freelancers?", available at www.berliner-zeitung.de/wirtschaft-verfassungung/interne-papierebevorzugt-die-rentenversicherung-den-staat-zulasten-von-freiberuflern-li.10009576) as well as in the publicly accessible Business process description of the German Pension Insurance Federation "GPB 190.05.20.00 - Coordination case" (available at https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/regelen-und-anweisungen-zur-belaboring-des-formulares-v0027/773420/anhang/koordination190-05-20-00.pdf) described practice, according to which so-called coordination notes are made before the passing on or issuance of Procedural files are taken and not sent when the files are inspected, even though they remain in a separate pension file, and what steps or consequences does it intend to draw from this with regard to transparency, file completeness, effective legal protection and the actual equal treatment of public and private clients in the status determination procedure in accordance with Section 7a of the Fourth Book of the Social Security Code?

Discovery translation for search and reading. The original official text remains authoritative.

Timeline

1. 6 March 2026

   Schriftliche Frage/Schriftliche Antwort

   Practice of the German Pension Insurance regarding coordination notes in procedural files

   Source: BT

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

No documents linked.

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.