European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 61994CJ0092
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 August 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security and Chief Adjudication Officer v Rose Graham, Mary Connell and Margaret Nicholas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - United Kingdom.#Equality between men and women - Invalidity benefits - Link with pensionable age.#Case C-92/94.
Introduced
11 August 1995
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
11 August 1995
Records
Official record CELEX 61994CJ0092 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 11 August 1995. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 August 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security and Chief Adjudication Officer v Rose Graham, Mary Connell and Margaret Nicholas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - United Kingdom.#Equality between men and women - Invalidity benefits - Link with pensionable age.#Case C-92/94.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 August 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security and Chief Adjudication Officer v Rose Graham, Mary Connell and Margaret Nicholas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - United Kingdom.#Equality between men and women - Invalidity benefits - Link with pensionable age.#Case C-92/94.
judgment · EN · 11 August 1995
Presuda Suda (šesto vijeće) od 11. kolovoza 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security i Chief Adjudication Officer protiv Rose Graham, Mary Connell i Margaret Nicholas.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Ujedinjena Kraljevina.#Predmet C-92/94.
judgment · HR · 11 August 1995
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (šiesta komora) z 11. augusta 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security a Chief Adjudication Officer proti Rose Graham, Mary Connell a Margaret Nicholas.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Spojené kráľovstvo.#Dávky v invalidite.#Vec C-92/94.
judgment · SK · 11 August 1995
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (šestého senátu) ze dne 11. srpna 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security a Chief Adjudication Officer proti Rose Graham, Mary Connell a Margaret Nicholas.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Spojené království.#Dávky v případě invalidity.#Věc C-92/94.
judgment · CS · 11 August 1995
1995 m. rugpjūčio 11 d. Teisingumo Teismo (šeštoji kolegija) sprendimas.#Secretary of State for Social Security ir Chief Adjudication Officer prieš Rose Graham, Mary Connell ir Margaret Nicholas.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Jungtinė Karalystė.#Invalidumo išmokos.#Byla C-92/94.
judgment · LT · 11 August 1995
A Bíróság (hatodik tanács) 1995. augusztus 11-i ítélete.#Secretary of State for Social Security és Chief Adjudication Officer kontra Rose Graham, Mary Connell és Margaret Nicholas.#Előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Egyesült Királyság.#Rokkantsági ellátások.#C-92/94. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 11 August 1995
Sodba Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 11. avgusta 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security in Chief Adjudication Officer proti Rose Graham, Mary Connell in Margaret Nicholas.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Združeno kraljestvo.#Invalidski dodatki.#Zadeva C-92/94.
judgment · SL · 11 August 1995
Wyrok Trybunału (szósta izba) z dnia 11 sierpnia 1995 r.#Secretary of State for Social Security i Chief Adjudication Officer przeciwko Rose Graham, Mary Connell i Margaret Nicholas.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Zjednoczone Królestwo.#świadczenia inwalidzkie.#Sprawa C-92/94.
judgment · PL · 11 August 1995
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (kuues koda), 11. august 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security ja Chief Adjudication Officer versus Rose Graham, Mary Connell ja Margaret Nicholas.#Eelotsusetaotlus: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Ühendkuningriik.#Invaliidushüvitised.#Kohtuasi C-92/94.
judgment · ET · 11 August 1995
Решение на Съда (шести състав) от 11 август 1995 г.#Secretary of State for Social Security и Chief Adjudication Officer срещу Rose Graham, Mary Connell и Margaret Nicholas.#Искане за преюдициално заключение: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Обединеното кралство.#Обезщетение за инвалидност.#Дело C-92/94.
judgment · BG · 11 August 1995
Tiesas spriedums (sestā palāta) 1995. gada 11. augustā.#Secretary of State for Social Security un Chief Adjudication Officer pret Rose Graham, Mary Connell un Margaret Nicholas.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Apvienotā Karaliste.#Invaliditātes pabalsti.#Lieta C-92/94.
judgment · LV · 11 August 1995
Hotărârea Curții (camera a șasea) din data de 11 august 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security și Chief Adjudication Officer împotriva Rose Graham, Mary Connell și Margaret Nicholas.#Cerere având ca obiect pronunțarea unei hotărâri preliminare: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Regatul Unit.#Prestații pentru invaliditate.#Cauza C-92/94.
judgment · RO · 11 August 1995
Domstolens dom (Sjette Afdeling) af 11. august 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security og Chief Adjudication Officer mod Rose Graham m.fl.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse: Court of Appeal, Civil Division, London (England) - Forenede Kongerige.#Ligebehandling af mænd og kvinder - invaliditetsydelser - tilknytning til pensionsalder.#Sag C-92/94.
judgment · DA · 11 August 1995
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (is-Sitt Awla) tal-11 ta' Awwissu 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security u Chief Adjudication Officer vs Rose Graham, Mary Connell u Margaret Nicholas.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - ir-Renju Unit.#Benefiċċji għall-invalidità.#Kawża C-92/94.
judgment · MT · 11 August 1995
Arrest van het Hof (Zesde kamer) van 11 augustus 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security en Chief Adjudication Officer tegen Rose Graham, Mary Connell en Margaret Nicholas.#Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Verenigd Koninkrijk.#Gelijke behandeling van mannen en vrouwen - Invaliditeitsuitkeringen - Verband met pensioenleeftijd.#Zaak C-92/94.
judgment · NL · 11 August 1995
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Sexta) de 11 de agosto de 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security y Chief Adjudication Officer contra Rose Graham, Mary Connell y Margaret Nicholas.#Petición de decisión prejudicial: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Reino Unido.#Igualdad entre hombres y mujeres - Prestaciones de invalidez - Relación con la edad de jubilación.#Asunto C-92/94.
judgment · ES · 11 August 1995
Urteil des Gerichtshofes (Sechste Kammer) vom 11. August 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security und Chief Adjudication Officer gegen Rose Graham, Mary Connell und Margaret Nicholas.#Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Court of Appeal (Civil Division), London - Vereinigtes Königreich.#Gleichbehandlung von Männern und Frauen - Leistungen bei Invalidität - Verknüpfung mit dem Rentenalter.#Rechtssache C-92/94.
judgment · DE · 11 August 1995
Acórdão do Tribunal (Sexta Secção) de 11 de Agosto de 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security e Chief Adjudication Officer contra Rose Graham, Mary Connell e Margaret Nicholas.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Reino Unido.#Igualdade entre homens e mulheres - Prestações por invalidez - Ligação com a idade da reforma.#Processo C-92/94.
judgment · PT · 11 August 1995
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (έκτο τμήμα) της 11ης Αυγούστου 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security και Chief Adjudication Officer κατά Rose Graham, Mary Connell και Margaret Nicholas.#Αίτηση για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο.#Ισότητα ανδρών και γυναικών - Παροχές αναπηρίας - Σύνδεσμος με την ηλικία συνταξιοδοτήσεως.#Υπόθεση C-92/94.
judgment · EL · 11 August 1995
Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 août 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security et Chief Adjudication Officer contre Rose Graham, Mary Connell et Margaret Nicholas.#Demande de décision préjudicielle: Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - Royaume-Uni.#Egalité entre hommes et femmes - Prestations d'invalidité - Lien avec l'âge de la retraite.#Affaire C-92/94.
judgment · FR · 11 August 1995
Domstolens dom (sjätte avdelningen) den 11 augusti 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security och Chief Adjudication Officer mot Rose Graham, Mary Connell och Margaret Nicholas.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Förenade kungariket.#Likabehandling av kvinnor och män - Invaliditetsförmåner - Samband med pensionsålder.#Mål C-92/94.
judgment · SV · 11 August 1995
Sentenza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) dell'11 agosto 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security e Chief Adjudication Officer contro Rose Graham e altre.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dalla Court of Appeal, Civil Division di Londra - Regno Unito.#Parità di trattamento tra uomini e donne - Prestazioni di invalidità - Collegamento con l'età pensionabile.#Causa C-92/94.
judgment · IT · 11 August 1995
Yhteisöjen tuomioistuimen tuomio (kuudes jaosto) 11 päivänä elokuuta 1995.#Secretary of State for Social Security ja Chief Adjudication Officer vastaan Rose Graham, Mary Connell ja Margaret Nicholas.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (England) - Yhdistynyt kuningaskunta.#Miesten ja naisten tasa-arvoinen kohtelu - Työkyvyttömyysetuudet - Yhteys eläkeikään.#Asia C-92/94.
judgment · FI · 11 August 1995
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.