PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TO

CELEX 62009TO0454

ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 28 June 2011.#Rinse van Arum v European Parliament.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Reports — Staff report — Reporting exercise for 2005 — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case T‑454/09 P.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

28 June 2011

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 June 2011

Records

Official record CELEX 62009TO0454 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 28 June 2011. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 28 June 2011.#Rinse van Arum v European Parliament.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Reports — Staff report — Reporting exercise for 2005 — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case T‑454/09 P.

View fileDownload file

  • ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 28 June 2011.#Rinse van Arum v European Parliament.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Reports — Staff report — Reporting exercise for 2005 — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · EN · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • DIGRIET TAL-QORTI ĠENERALI (Awla tal-Appell) 28 ta’ Ġunju 2011.#Rinse van Arum vs Il-Parlament Ewropew.#Appell — Servizz pubbliku — Uffiċjali — Evalwazzjoni — Rapport ta’ evalwazzjoni — Proċedura ta’ evalwazzjoni 2005 — Appell parzjalment manifestament inammissibbli u parzjalment manifestament infondat.#Kawża T-454/09 P.

    judgment · MT · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • VISPĀRĒJĀS TIESAS RĪKOJUMS (apelācijas palāta) 2011. gada 28. jūnijā.#Rinse van Arum pret Eiropas Parlamentu.#Apelācija – Civildienests – Ierēdņi – Novērtējums – Novērtējuma ziņojums – 2005. gada novērtējums – Daļēji acīmredzami nepieņemama un daļēji acīmredzami nepamatota apelācijas sūdzība.#Lieta T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · LV · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • UZNESENIE VŠEOBECNÉHO SÚDU (odvolacia komora) z 28. júna 2011.#Rinse van Arum proti Európskemu parlamentu.#Odvolanie – Verejná služba – Úradníci – Hodnotenie – Hodnotiaca správa – Hodnotené obdobie 2005 – Odvolanie, ktoré je čiastočne zjavne neprípustné a čiastočne zjavne nedôvodné.#Vec T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · SK · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • ORDINANZA DEL TRIBUNALE (Sezione delle impugnazioni) 28 giugno 2011.#Rinse van Arum contro Parlamento europeo.#Impugnazione – Funzione pubblica – Funzionari – Valutazione – Rapporto informativo – Esercizio di valutazione 2005 – Impugnazione in parte manifestamente irricevibile e in parte manifestamente infondata.#Causa T-454/09 P.

    judgment · IT · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • BESCHLUSS DES GERICHTS (Rechtsmittelkammer) 28. Juni 2011.#Rinse van Arum gegen Europäisches Parlament.#Rechtsmittel – Öffentlicher Dienst – Beamte – Beurteilung – Beurteilungsverfahren 2005 – Teilweise offensichtlich unzulässiges und teilweise offensichtlich unbegründetes Rechtsmittel.#Rechtssache T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · DE · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • ORDNNANCE DU TRIBUNAL (chambre des pourvois) du 28 juin 2011.#Rinse van Arum contre Parlement européen.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Notation – Rapport de notation – Exercice de notation 2005 – Pourvoi en partie manifestement irrecevable et en partie manifestement non fondé.#Affaire T-454/09 P.

    judgment · FR · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • USNESENÍ TRIBUNÁLU (kasační senát) 28. června 2011.#Rinse van Arum v. Evropský parlament.#Kasační opravný prostředek – Veřejná služba – Úředníci – Hodnocení – Hodnotící posudek – Hodnocení za rok 2005 – Zčásti zjevně nepřípustný a zčásti zjevně neopodstatněný kasační opravný prostředek.#Věc T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · CS · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 2011 m. birželio 28 d. Bendrojo Teismo (apeliacinių skundų kolegija) nutartis.#Rinse van Arum prieš Europos Parlementą.#Apeliacinis skundas – Viešoji tarnyba – Pareigūnai – Vertinimas – Vertinimo ataskaita – 2005 m. vertinimo procedūra – Iš dalies akivaizdžiai nepriimtinas ir iš dalies akivaizdžiai nepagrįstas apeliacinis skundas.#Byla T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · LT · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rješenje Općeg suda (žalbeno vijeće) od 2011. lipanj 28.#Rinse van Arum protiv Europski parlament.#Predmet T-454/09 P.

    judgment · HR · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Postanowienie Sądu (izba ds. odwołań) z dnia 28 czerwca 2011 r.#Rinse van Arum przeciwko Parlamentowi Europejskiemu.#Odwołanie – Służba publiczna – Urzędnicy – Ocena – Sprawozdanie z oceny – Postępowanie w sprawie oceny za 2005 r. – Odwołanie w części oczywiście niedopuszczalne, a w części oczywiście bezzasadne.#Sprawa T-454/09 P.

    judgment · PL · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • ORDONANȚA TRIBUNALULUI (Camera de recursuri) 28 iunie 2011.#Rinse van Arum împotriva Parlamentului European.#Recurs – Funcție publică – Funcționari – Evaluare – Raport de evaluare – Exercițiul de evaluare 2005 – Recurs în parte vădit inadmisibil și în parte vădit nefondat.#Cauza T-454/09 P.

    judgment · RO · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • DESPACHO DO TRIBUNAL GERAL (Secção dos recursos das decisões do Tribunal da Função Pública) de 28 de Junho de 2011.#Rinse van Arum contra Parlamento Europeu.#Recurso de decisão do Tribunal da Função Pública — Função pública — Funcionários — Classificação — Relatório de classificação — Exercício de classificação de 2005 — Recurso em parte manifestamente inadmissível e em parte manifestamente improcedente.#Processo T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · PT · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • TRIBUNALENS BESLUT (avdelningen för överklaganden) den 28 juni 2011.#Rinse van Arum mot Europaparlamentet.#Överklagande – Personalmål – Tjänstemän – Betygsättning – Betygsrapport – Betygsförfarandet för år 2005 – Uppenbart att överklagandet delvis inte kan tas upp till prövning och delvis är ogrundat.#Mål T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · SV · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • ΔΙΑΤΑΞΗ ΤΟΥ ΓΕΝΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΗΡΟΥ (αναιρετικό τμήμα) της 28ης Ιουνίου 2011.#Rinse van Arum κατά Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου.#Αίτηση αναίρεσης — Υπαλληλική υπόθεση — Υπάλληλοι — Βαθμολογία — Έκθεση βαθμολογίας — Περίοδος αξιολόγησης 2005 — Αίτηση αναίρεσης εν μέρει προδήλως απαράδεκτη και εν μέρει προδήλως αβάσιμη.#Υπόθεση T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · EL · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin yleisen tuomioistuimen määräys (muutoksenhakujaosto) 28 päivänä kesäkuuta 2011.#Rinse van Arum vastaan Euroopan parlamentti.#Muutoksenhaku – Henkilöstö – Virkamiehet – Arviointi – Arviointikertomus – Vuoden 2005 arviointikierros – Valitus, jonka tutkittavaksi ottamisen edellytykset osittain selvästi puuttuvat ja joka on osittain selvästi perusteeton.#Asia T-454/09 P.

    judgment · FI · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ НА ОБЩИЯ СЪД (състав по жалбите) 28 юни 2011 година.#Rinse van Arum срещу Европейски парламент Резюме.#Обжалване — Публична служба — Длъжностни лица — Атестиране — Атестационен доклад — Процедура по атестиране за 2005 г. — Жалба, която е частично явно недопустима и частично явно неоснователна.#Дело T-454/09 P.

    judgment · BG · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • AUTO DEL TRIBUNAL GENERAL (Sala de Casación) de 28 de junio de 2011.#Rinse van Arum contra Parlamento Europeo.#Recurso de casación — Función pública — Funcionarios — Calificación — Informe de calificación — Ejercicio de calificación 2005 — Recurso de casación manifiestamente inadmisible en parte y manifiestamente infundado en parte.#Asunto T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · ES · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • A TÖRVÉNYSZÉK VÉGZÉSE (fellebbezési tanács) 2011. június 28.#Rinse van Arum kontra Európai Parlament Összefoglaló.#Fellebbezés – Közszolgálat – Tisztviselők – Értékelés – Értékelő jelentés – 2005. évi értékelési időszak – Részben nyilvánvalóan elfogadhatatlan, részben nyilvánvalóan megalapozatlan fellebbezés.#T‑454/09. P. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Üldkohtu määrus (apellatsioonikoda), 28.6.2011.#Rinse van Arum versus Euroopa Parlament.#Apellatsioonkaebus – Avalik teenistus – Ametnikud – Hindamine – Hindamisaruanne – Hindamisperiood 2005 – Osaliselt ilmselgelt vastuvõetamatu ja osaliselt ilmselgelt põhjendamatu apellatsioonkaebus.#Kohtuasi T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · ET · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • RETTENS KENDELSE (Appelafdelingen) 28. juni 2011.#Rinse van Arum mod Europa-Parlamentet.#Appel – personalesag – tjenestemænd – bedømmelse – bedømmelsesrapport – bedømmelsesåret 2005 – åbenbart, at appellen delvis ikke kan antages til realitetsbehandling, delvis er ugrundet.#Sag T-454/09 P.

    judgment · DA · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • SKLEP SPLOŠNEGA SODIŠČA (pritožbeni senat) z dne 28. junija 2011.#Rinse van Arum proti Evropskemu parlamentu.#Pritožba – Javni uslužbenci – Uradniki – Ocenjevanje – Ocenjevalno poročilo – Ocenjevalno obdobje 2005 – Delno očitno nedopustna in delno očitno neutemeljena pritožba.#Zadeva T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · SL · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • BESCHIKKING VAN HET GERECHT (Kamer voor hogere voorzieningen) 28 juni 2011.#Rinse van Arum tegen Europees Parlement.#Hogere voorziening – Openbare dienst – Ambtenaren – Beoordeling – Beoordelingsrapport – Beoordelingsronde 2005 – Hogere voorziening deels kennelijk niet-ontvankelijk en deels kennelijk ongegrond.#Zaak T‑454/09 P.

    judgment · NL · 28 June 2011

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.