Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 11 July 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Directives 84/450/EEC and 2006/114/EC — Misleading and comparative advertising — Definition of ‘advertising’ — Registration and use of a domain name — Use of metatags in a website’s metadata.#Case C‑657/11.

Record

Official record CELEX 62011CJ0657 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 11 July 2013. Status: decided.

Timeline

1. 11 July 2013

   Decided

   Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

• Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 11 July 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Directives 84/450/EEC and 2006/114/EC — Misleading and comparative advertising — Definition of ‘advertising’ — Registration and use of a domain name — Use of metatags in a website’s metadata.#Case C‑657/11.

  judgment · EN · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudek Soudního dvora (třetího senátu) ze dne 11. července 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV v. Bert Peelaers a Visys NV.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Hof van Cassatie.#Směrnice 84/450/EHS a 2006/114/ES – Klamavá a srovnávací reklama – Pojem ‚reklama‘ – Registrace a užívání názvu domény – Používání metatagů v metadatech internetové stránky.#Věc C‑657/11.

  judgment · CS · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Решение на Съда (трети състав) от 11 юли 2013 г.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV срещу Bert Peelaers и Visys NV.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Hof van Cassatie.#Директиви 84/450/ЕИО и 2006/114/ЕО — Заблуждаваща и сравнителна реклама — Понятие „реклама“ — Регистрация и използване на наименование на домейн — Използване на метатагове в метаданните на уебсайт.#Дело C‑657/11.

  judgment · BG · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• 2013 m. liepos 11 d. Teisingumo Teismo (trečioji kolegija) sprendimas.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV prieš Bert Peelaers ir Visys NV.#Hof van Cassatie prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Direktyvos 84/450/EEB ir 2006/114/EB – Klaidinanti reklama ir lyginamoji reklama – Sąvoka „reklama“ – Domeno vardo registracija ir naudojimas – Metagairių naudojimas interneto svetainės metaduomenyse.#Byla C-657/11.

  judgment · LT · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Wyrok Trybunału (trzecia izba) z dnia 11 lipca 2013 r.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV przeciwko Bertowi Peelaersowi i Visys NV.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Hof van Cassatie.#Dyrektywy 84/450/EWG i 2006/114/WE – Reklama wprowadzająca w błąd i reklama porównawcza – Pojęcie reklamy – Rejestracja i używanie nazwy domeny – Używanie metatagów w metadanych strony internetowej.#Sprawa C-657/11.

  judgment · PL · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (tretia komora) z 11. júla 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV proti Bertovi Peelaersovi a Visys NV.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania podaný Hof van cassatie.#Smernice 84/450/EHS a 2006/114/ES – Klamlivá a porovnávacia reklama – Pojem ‚reklama‘ – Registrácia a používanie názvu domény – Používanie metatagov v metaúdajoch internetovej stránky.#Vec C‑657/11.

  judgment · SK · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Sodba Sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 11. julija 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV proti Bertu Peelaersu in Visys NV.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Hof van Cassatie.#Direktivi 84/450/EGS in 2006/114/ES – Zavajajoče in primerjalno oglaševanje – Pojem ‚oglaševanje‘ – Registracija in uporaba imena domene – Uporaba metaoznak v metapodatkih spletnega mesta.#Zadeva C‑657/11.

  judgment · SL · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Tercera) de 11 de julio de 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV contra Bert Peelaers y Visys NV.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Hof van Cassatie.#Directivas 84/450/CEE y 2006/114/CE — Publicidad engañosa y publicidad comparativa — Concepto de “publicidad” — Registro y utilización de un nombre de dominio — Utilización de indicadores de hipertexto en los metadatosde un sitio de Internet.#Asunto C‑657/11.

  judgment · ES · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (τρίτο τμήμα) της 11ης Ιουλίου 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV κατά Bert Peelaers και Visys NV.#Αίτηση του Hof van Cassatie για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Οδηγίες 84/450/ΕΟΚ και 2006/114/ΕΚ — Παραπλανητική και συγκριτική διαφήμιση — Έννοια της διαφημίσεως — Καταχώριση και χρήση ονόματος τομέα — Χρήση μεταετικετών στα μεταδεδομένα ιστοτόπου.#Υπόθεση C‑657/11.

  judgment · EL · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Terceira Secção) de 11 de julho de 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV contra Bert Peelaers e Visys NV.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Hof van Cassatie.#Diretivas 84/450/CEE e 2006/114/CE — Publicidade enganosa e publicidade comparativa — Conceito de ‘publicidade’ — Registo e utilização de um nome de domínio — Utilização de etiquetas em metadados de um sítio Internet.#Processo C‑657/11.

  judgment · PT · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 11 juillet 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV contre Bert Peelaers et Visys NV.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Hof van Cassatie.#Directives 84/450/CEE et 2006/114/CE – Publicité trompeuse et publicité comparative – Notion de ‘publicité’ – Enregistrement et utilisation d’un nom de domaine – Utilisation de balises méta dans les métadonnées d’un site Internet.#Affaire C‑657/11.

  judgment · FR · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 11. Juli 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV gegen Bert Peelaers und Visys NV.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Hof van Cassatie.#Richtlinien 84/450/EWG und 2006/114/EG – Irreführende und vergleichende Werbung – Begriff ‚Werbung‘ – Registrierung und Nutzung eines Domain-Namens – Nutzung von Metatags in den Metadaten einer Website.#Rechtssache C‑657/11.

  judgment · DE · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Presuda Suda (treće vijeće) od 11. srpnja 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV protiv Bert Peelaers i Visys NV.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Hof van Cassatie.#Direktive 84/450/EEZ i 2006/114/EZ – Zavaravajuće oglašavanje i komparativno oglašavanje – Pojam ,oglašavanja’ – Registracija i upotreba imena domene – Upotreba metaoznaka u metapodacima internetske stranice.#Predmet C-657/11.

  judgment · HR · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza della Corte (Terza Sezione) dell’11 luglio 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV contro Bert Peelaers e Visys NV.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dallo Hof van Cassatie.#Direttive 84/450/CEE e 2006/114/CE — Pubblicità ingannevole e pubblicità comparativa — Nozione di “pubblicità” — Registrazione e utilizzo di un nome di dominio — Utilizzo di metatags nei metadati di un sito Internet.#Causa C‑657/11.

  judgment · IT · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (tredje avdelningen) av den 11 juli 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV mot Bert Peelaers och Visys NV.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Hof van Cassatie.#Direktiven 84/450/EEG och 2006/114/EG – Vilseledande och jämförande reklam – Begreppet reklam – Registrering och användning av ett domännamn – Användning av metataggar i en webbplats metadata.#Mål C‑657/11.

  judgment · SV · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Tiesas (trešā palāta) 2013. gada 11. jūlija spriedums.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV pret Bert Peelaers un Visys NV.#Hof van Cassatie lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Direktīva 84/450/EEK un Direktīva 2006/114/EK – Maldinoša un salīdzinoša reklāma – “Reklāmas” jēdziens – Domēna nosaukuma reģistrācija un izmantošana – “Metatags” izmantošana interneta vietnes metadatos.#Lieta C‑657/11.

  judgment · LV · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Euroopa Kohtu otsus (kolmas koda), 11.7.2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV versus Bert Peelaers ja Visys NV.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Hof van Cassatie.#Direktiivid 84/450/EMÜ ja 2006/114/EÜ – Eksitav reklaam ja võrdlev reklaam – Mõiste „reklaam” – Domeeninime registreerimine ja kasutamine – Metasiltide kasutamine veebisaidi metaandmetes.#Kohtuasi C‑657/11.

  judgment · ET · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Hotărârea Curții (Camera a treia) din 11 iulie 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV împotriva Bert Peelaers și Visys NV.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Hof van Cassatie.#Directivele 84/450/CEE și 2006/114/CE – Publicitate înșelătoare și publicitate comparativă – Noțiunea „publicitate” – Înregistrarea și utilizarea unui nume de domeniu – Utilizarea de metataguri în metadatele unui site internet.#Cauza C-657/11.

  judgment · RO · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Arrest van het Hof (Derde kamer) van 11 juli 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV tegen Bert Peelaers en Visys NV.#Verzoek van het Hof van Cassatie om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Richtlijnen 84/450/EEG en 2006/114/EG – Misleidende reclame en vergelijkende reclame – Begrip ‚reclame’ – Registratie en gebruik van domeinnaam – Gebruik van metatags in metadata van website.#Zaak C‑657/11.

  judgment · NL · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tielet Awla) tal-11 ta’ Lulju 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV vs Bert Peelaers u Visys NV.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mill-Hof van Cassatie.#Direttivi 84/450/KEE u 2006/114/KE — Reklamar qarrieqi u reklamar komparattiv — Kunċett ta’ ‘reklamar’ — Reġistrazzjoni u użu ta’ isem tad-domain — Użu ta’ metaidentifikaturi fil-metadejta ta’ sit tal-internet.#Kawża C‑657/11.

  judgment · MT · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Domstolens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 11. juli 2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV mod Bert Peelaers og Visys NV.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Hof van Cassatie.#Direktiv 84/450/EØF og 2006/114/EF – vildledende og sammenlignende reklame – begrebet »reklame« – registrering og brug af et domænenavn – anvendelse af metatags i en websides metadata.#Sag C-657/11.

  judgment · DA · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (kolmas jaosto) 11.7.2013.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV vastaan Bert Peelaers ja Visys NV.#Hof van Cassatien esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Direktiivit 84/450/ETY ja 2006/114/EY – Harhaanjohtava mainonta ja vertaileva mainonta – Mainonnan käsite – Verkkotunnuksen rekisteröinti ja käyttö – Metatagien käyttö internetsivuston metatiedoissa.#Asia C-657/11.

  judgment · FI · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

• A Bíróság ítélete (harmadik tanács), 2013. július 11.#Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology NV kontra Bert Peelaers és Visys NV.#A Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#84/450/EGK irányelv és 2006/114/EK irányelv – Megtévesztő reklám és összehasonlító reklám – A „reklám” fogalma – Domainnév bejegyeztetése és használata – Metatageknek valamely weboldal metaadataiban történő használata.#C‑657/11. sz. ügy.

  judgment · HU · 11 July 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
• · a0e7a6fe-c766-448a-8285-2207cb37f5ad · a0e7a6fe-c766-448a-8285-2207cb37f5ad

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.