PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TJ

CELEX 62012TJ0017

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2014.#Moritz Hagenmeyer and Andreas Hahn v European Commission.#Consumer protection - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Health claims made on food - Non-authorization of a claim about the reduction of a risk of disease - Mention of a risk factor - Lawfulness of the procedure for the approval of claims about the reduction of a risk of disease - Action for annulment - Interest in legal protection - Direct and individual concern - Admissibility - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑17/12.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· DE

Introduced

30 April 2014

Last action

30 April 2014 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

30 April 2014

Records

Official record CELEX 62012TJ0017 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 30 April 2014. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 30 April 2014

    Decided

    Source: Work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Urteil des Gerichts (Fünfte Kammer) vom 30. April 2014.#Moritz Hagenmeyer und Andreas Hahn gegen Europäische Kommission.#Verbraucherschutz – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1924/2006 – Gesundheitsbezogene Angaben über Lebensmittel – Nichtzulassung einer Angabe über die Reduzierung eines Krankheitsrisikos – Nennung eines Risikofaktors – Rechtmäßigkeit des Verfahrens für die Zulassung von Angaben über die Reduzierung eines Krankheitsrisikos – Nichtigkeitsklage – Rechtsschutzinteresse – Unmittelbare und individuelle Betroffenheit – Zulässigkeit – Verhältnismäßigkeit – Begründungspflicht.#Rechtssache T‑17/12.

    judgment · DE · 30 April 2014

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

  • · GCEU · General Court

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.