PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TJ

CELEX 62014TJ0659

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 November 2015.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark PORT CHARLOTTE — Earlier designations of origin ‘porto’ and ‘port’ — Grounds for invalidity — Article 52(1)(a), Article 53(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(c) and (g) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 118m(2) of Regulation (EC) No 491/2009.#Case T-659/14.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

18 November 2015

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

18 November 2015

Records

Official record CELEX 62014TJ0659 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 18 November 2015. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 November 2015.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark PORT CHARLOTTE — Earlier designations of origin ‘porto’ and ‘port’ — Grounds for invalidity — Article 52(1)(a), Article 53(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(c) and (g) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Article 118m(2) of Regulation (EC) No 491/2009.#Case T-659/14.

    judgment · EN · 18 November 2015

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.