PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · TO

CELEX 62014TO0381(03)

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2016.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Proof that inclusion on the list is justified — Manifestly well-founded action.#Case T-381/14.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

10 June 2016

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

10 June 2016

Records

Official record CELEX 62014TO0381(03) from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 10 June 2016. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2016.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Proof that inclusion on the list is justified — Manifestly well-founded action.#Case T-381/14.

View fileDownload file

  • Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2016.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Admissibility — Proof that inclusion on the list is justified — Manifestly well-founded action.#Case T-381/14.

    judgment · EN · 10 June 2016

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.