PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62015CJ0376

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 April 2017.#Changshu City Standard Parts Factory and Ningbo Jinding Fastener Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2(10) and (11) — Exclusion of certain export transactions for the purposes of calculating the dumping margin — Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value in the case of imports from a non-market economy country.#Case C-376/15 P.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

5 April 2017

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 April 2017

Records

Official record CELEX 62015CJ0376 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 5 April 2017. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 April 2017.#Changshu City Standard Parts Factory and Ningbo Jinding Fastener Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 — Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 2(10) and (11) — Exclusion of certain export transactions for the purposes of calculating the dumping margin — Fair comparison between the export price and the normal value in the case of imports from a non-market economy country.#Case C-376/15 P.

    judgment · EN · 5 April 2017

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.