PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · FJ

CELEX 62015FJ0060

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of March 2, 2016.#José Luis Ruiz Molina v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks, Designs and Models).#Public service – Temporary agent – ​​OHIM staff – Fixed-term contract with a termination clause – Clause terminating the contract in the event that the agent is not included on the reserve list for a competition – Termination of the contract pursuant to the termination clause – Effective date of the termination clause – Open competitions OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13.#Case F-60/15.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· FR

Introduced

2 March 2016

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 March 2016

Records

Official record CELEX 62015FJ0060 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 March 2016. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Arrêt du Tribunal de la fonction publique (troisième chambre) du 2 mars 2016.#José Luis Ruiz Molina contre Office de l'harmonisation dans le marché intérieur (marques, dessins et modèles).#Fonction publique – Agent temporaire – Personnel de l’OHMI – Contrat à durée déterminée assorti d’une clause de résiliation – Clause mettant fin au contrat dans l’hypothèse où l’agent n’est pas inscrit sur la liste de réserve d’un concours – Résiliation du contrat en application de la clause de résiliation – Date de prise d’effet de la clause de résiliation – Concours généraux OHIM/AD/01/13 et OHIM/AST/02/13.#Affaire F-60/15.

    judgment · FR · 2 March 2016

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.