European Union · Record · FJ
CELEX 62015FJ0083
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 1 March 2016.#Antonio Pujante Cuadrupani v European GNSS Agency (GSA).#Civil service – Recruitment – Temporary agent – Dismissal at the end of the probationary period – Action for annulment directed against both the dismissal decision and the confirmatory dismissal decision – Admissibility – Article 14(3) of the RAA – Misuse of power and procedure – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defense – Consultation of the joint evaluation committee – Opinion based on examination of written documents, without hearing the applicant – No violation of the rights of the defense.#Case F-83/15.
Introduced
1 March 2016
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
1 March 2016
Records
Official record CELEX 62015FJ0083 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 1 March 2016. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Arrêt du Tribunal de la fonction publique (deuxième chambre) du 1er mars 2016.#Antonio Pujante Cuadrupani contre Agence du GNSS européen (GSA).#Fonction publique – Recrutement – Agent temporaire – Licenciement à l’issue de la période de stage – Recours en annulation dirigé à la fois contre la décision de licenciement et la décision confirmative de licenciement – Recevabilité – Article 14, paragraphe 3, du RAA – Détournement de pouvoir et de procédure – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Droits de la défense – Consultation du comité paritaire d’évaluation – Avis reposant sur l’examen de pièces écrites, sans audition du requérant – Absence de violation des droits de la défense.#Affaire F-83/15.
judgment · FR · 1 March 2016
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.