European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62016CJ0327
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of March 22, 2018.#Marc Jacob v Minister of Finance and Public Accounts.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct taxation – Freedom of establishment – Mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different States – Directive 90/434/EEC – Article 8 – Securities exchange transaction – Capital gains relating to this transaction – Report tax – Capital losses during the subsequent transfer of securities received – Taxation jurisdiction of the State of residence – Difference in treatment – Justification – Preservation of the distribution of tax jurisdiction between the Member States.#Case C-327/16.
Introduced
22 March 2018
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
22 March 2018
Records
Official record CELEX 62016CJ0327 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 22 March 2018. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 22 mars 2018.#Marc Jacob contre Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité directe – Liberté d’établissement – Fusions, scissions, apports d’actifs et échanges d’actions intéressant des sociétés d’États différents – Directive 90/434/CEE – Article 8 – Opération d’échange de titres – Plus-values afférentes à cette opération – Report d’imposition – Moins-values lors de la cession ultérieure des titres reçus – Compétence d’imposition de l’État de résidence – Différence de traitement – Justification – Préservation de la répartition de la compétence fiscale entre les États membres.#Affaire C-327/16.
judgment · FR · 22 March 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.