Judgment of the Court of Justice (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2019.#Georgios Pandalis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeals - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 51(1)(a) and (2) and Article 75 - EU trade mark Cystus - Non-medical food supplement - Partial revocation - No genuine use of the mark - Perception of the Term 'Cystus' as a descriptive indication of the essential ingredient of the goods in question - obligation to state reasons.#Case C-194/17 P.

Records

Official record CELEX 62017CJ0194 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 31 January 2019. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 31. Januar 2019.#Georgios Pandalis gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Rechtsmittel – Unionsmarke – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 207/2009 – Art. 51 Abs. 1 Buchst. a und Abs. 2 sowie Art. 75 – Unionsmarke Cystus – Nicht medizinisches Nahrungsergänzungsmittel – Teilweise Verfallserklärung – Keine ernsthafte Benutzung der Marke – Wahrnehmung des Begriffs ‚Cystus‘ als beschreibende Angabe des wesentlichen Inhaltsstoffs der betreffenden Waren – Begründungspflicht.#Rechtssache C-194/17 P.

  judgment · DE · 31 January 2019

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.