PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62017CJ0386_SUM

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 January 2019.#Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Judicial jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Article 5, point 2 – Article 27 – Article 35, paragraph 3 – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 19 – Lis pendens – Article 22(a) – Article 23(a) – Non-recognition of decisions in the event of manifest contravention of public policy – Article 24 – Prohibition on reviewing the jurisdiction of the court of origin – Ground for non-recognition based on ignorance of the rules of lis pendens – Absence.#Case C-386/17.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· FR

Introduced

16 January 2019

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

16 January 2019

Records

Official record CELEX 62017CJ0386_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 January 2019. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 16 janvier 2019.#Stefano Liberato contre Luminita Luisa Grigorescu.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière d’obligations alimentaires – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Article 5, point 2 – Article 27 – Article 35, paragraphe 3 – Compétence, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière matrimoniale et en matière de responsabilité parentale – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Article 19 – Litispendance – Article 22, sous a) – Article 23, sous a) – Non-reconnaissance des décisions en cas de contrariété manifeste avec l’ordre public – Article 24 – Interdiction de procéder au contrôle de la compétence de la juridiction d’origine – Motif de non-reconnaissance fondée sur une méconnaissance des règles de litispendance – Absence.#Affaire C-386/17.

    judgment · FR · 16 January 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.