European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62017CJ0386_SUM
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 January 2019.#Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Judicial jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Article 5, point 2 – Article 27 – Article 35, paragraph 3 – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 19 – Lis pendens – Article 22(a) – Article 23(a) – Non-recognition of decisions in the event of manifest contravention of public policy – Article 24 – Prohibition on reviewing the jurisdiction of the court of origin – Ground for non-recognition based on ignorance of the rules of lis pendens – Absence.#Case C-386/17.
Introduced
16 January 2019
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
16 January 2019
Records
Official record CELEX 62017CJ0386_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 16 January 2019. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 16 janvier 2019.#Stefano Liberato contre Luminita Luisa Grigorescu.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière d’obligations alimentaires – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Article 5, point 2 – Article 27 – Article 35, paragraphe 3 – Compétence, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière matrimoniale et en matière de responsabilité parentale – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Article 19 – Litispendance – Article 22, sous a) – Article 23, sous a) – Non-reconnaissance des décisions en cas de contrariété manifeste avec l’ordre public – Article 24 – Interdiction de procéder au contrôle de la compétence de la juridiction d’origine – Motif de non-reconnaissance fondée sur une méconnaissance des règles de litispendance – Absence.#Affaire C-386/17.
judgment · FR · 16 January 2019
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.