Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Brian Holohan and Others v An Bord Pleanála.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Conservation of wild fauna and flora — Road construction project — Appropriate assessment of effects on the environment — Extent of the obligation to state reasons — Directive 2011/92/EU — Assessment of the implications of certain projects — Annex IV, Point 3 — Article 5(3)(d) — Meaning of the concept of ‘main alternatives’.#Case C-461/17.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

7 November 2018

Last action

7 November 2018 · Decided

Status

decided

Records

Official record CELEX 62017CJ0461 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 7 November 2018. Status: decided.

Timeline

7 November 2018
Decided
Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 7 novembre 2018.#Brian Holohan e.a. contre An Bord Pleanála.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par la High Court (Irlande).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels – Conservation de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Projet de construction routière – Évaluation appropriée des incidences sur l’environnement – Étendue de l’obligation de motivation – Directive 2011/92/UE – Évaluation des incidences de certains projets – Annexe IV, point 3 – Article 5, paragraphe 3, sous d) – Portée de la notion de “principales solutions de substitution”.#Affaire C-461/17.

View file Download file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

Translate to

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 7 novembre 2018.#Brian Holohan e.a. contre An Bord Pleanála.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par la High Court (Irlande).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Conservation des habitats naturels – Conservation de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Projet de construction routière – Évaluation appropriée des incidences sur l’environnement – Étendue de l’obligation de motivation – Directive 2011/92/UE – Évaluation des incidences de certains projets – Annexe IV, point 3 – Article 5, paragraphe 3, sous d) – Portée de la notion de “principales solutions de substitution”.#Affaire C-461/17.
judgment · FR · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
2018 m. lapkričio 7 d. Teisingumo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#Brian Holohan ir kt. prieš An Bord Pleanála.#High Court (Airija) prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Aplinka – Direktyva 92/43/EEB – Natūralių buveinių apsauga – Laukinės faunos ir floros apsauga – Kelių statybos projektas – Tinkamas poveikio aplinkai vertinimas – Pareigos motyvuoti apimtis – Direktyva 2011/92/ES – Tam tikrų projektų poveikio vertinimas – IV priedo 3 punktas – 5 straipsnio 3 dalies d punktas – Sąvokos „pagrindinės alternatyvos“ apimtis.#Byla C-461/17.
judgment · LT · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Segunda) de 7 de noviembre de 2018.#Brian Holohan y otros contra An Bord Pleanála.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por la High Court (Irlanda).#Procedimiento prejudicial — Medio ambiente — Directiva 92/43/CEE — Conservación de los hábitats naturales — Conservación de la fauna y flora silvestres — Proyecto de construcción de carretera — Evaluación adecuada de las repercusiones en el medio ambiente — Alcance de la obligación de motivación — Directiva 2011/92/UE — Evaluación de las repercusiones de determinados proyectos — Anexo IV, número 3 — Artículo 5, apartado 3, letra d) — Alcance del concepto de “principales alternativas”.#Asunto C-461/17.
judgment · ES · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (második tanács), 2018. november 7.#Brian Holohan és társai kontra An Bord Pleanála.#A High Court (Írország) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Környezet – 92/43/EGK irányelv – A természetes élőhelyek védelme – A vadon élő állatok és növények védelme – Útépítési projekt – A környezetre gyakorolt hatások megfelelő vizsgálata – Az indokolási kötelezettség terjedelme – 2011/92/EU irányelv – Egyes projektek hatásvizsgálata – A IV. melléklet 3. pontja – Az 5. cikk (3) bekezdésének d) pontja – A »főbb alternatívák« fogalmának jelentése.#C-461/17. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 7. novembra 2018.#Brian Holohan in drugi proti An Bord Pleanála.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo High Court (Irska).#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Direktiva 92/43/EGS – Ohranjanje naravnih habitatov – Ohranjanje prostoživečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst – Projekt gradnje ceste – Ustrezna presoja vplivov na okolje – Obseg obveznosti obrazložitve – Direktiva 2011/92/EU – Presoja vplivov določenih projektov – Priloga IV, točka 3 – Člen 5(3)(d) – Obseg pojma ,glavne alternative‘.#Zadeva C-461/17.
judgment · SL · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (teine koda), 7.11.2018.#Brian Holohan jt versus An Bord Pleanála.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud High Court (Irlande).#Eelotsusetaotlus – Keskkond – Direktiiv 92/43/EMÜ – Looduslike elupaikade kaitse – Loodusliku loomastiku ja taimestiku kaitse – Tee-ehituse projekt – Asjakohane keskkonnamõju hindamine – Põhjendamiskohustuse ulatus – Direktiiv 2011/92/EL – Teatavate projektide mõju hindamine – IV lisa punkt 3 – Artikli 5 lõike 3 punkt d – Mõiste „muud peamised lahendusvõimalused“ ulatus.#Kohtuasi C-461/17.
judgment · ET · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 7. november 2018.#Brian Holohan m.fl. mod An Bord Pleanála.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af High Court (Irland).#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – miljø – direktiv 92/43/EØF – bevaring af naturtyper – bevaring af vilde dyr og planter – vejanlægsprojekt – passende vurdering af indvirkningen på miljøet – begrundelsespligtens omfang – direktiv 2011/92/EU – vurdering af visse projekters indvirkning – bilag IV, punkt 3 – artikel 5, stk. 3, litra d) – rækkevidden af begrebet »de væsentligste alternativer«.#Sag C-461/17.
judgment · DA · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tas-7 ta’ Novembru 2018.#Brian Holohan et vs An Bord Pleanála.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-High Court (l-Irlanda).#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Ambjent – Direttiva 92/43/KEE – Konservazzjoni tal-habitats naturali – Konservazzjoni tal-fawna u tal-flora selvaġġa – Proġett ta’ kostruzzjoni ta’ toroq – Evalwazzjoni xierqa tal-effetti fuq l-ambjent – Portata tal-obbligu ta’ motivazzjoni – Direttiva 2011/92/UE – Evalwazzjoni tal-effetti ta’ ċerti proġetti – Anness IV, punt 3 – Artikolu 5(3)(d) – Portata tal-kunċett ta’ ‘alternattivi ewlenin prinċipali’.#Kawża C-461/17.
judgment · MT · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 7 listopada 2018 r.#Brian Holohan i in. przeciwko An Bord Pleanála.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez High Court (Irlande).#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Środowisko naturalne – Dyrektywa 92/43/EWG – Ochrona siedlisk przyrodniczych – Ochrona dzikiej fauny i flory – Przedsięwzięcie budownictwa drogowego – Odpowiednia ocena oddziaływania na środowisko – Zakres obowiązku uzasadnienia – Dyrektywa 2011/92/UE – Ocena skutków wywieranych przez niektóre przedsięwzięcia – Punkt 3 załącznika IV – Artykuł 5 ust. 3 lit. d) – Zakres pojęcia „zasadniczych rozwiązań alternatywnych”.#Sprawa C-461/17.
judgment · PL · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 7ης Νοεμβρίου 2018.#Brian Holohan κ.λπ. κατά An Bord Pleanála.#Αίτηση του High Court (Ιρλανδία) για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Περιβάλλον – Οδηγία 92/43/ΕΟΚ – Διατήρηση των φυσικών οικοτόπων – Διατήρηση της άγριας πανίδας και χλωρίδας – Έργο οδοποιίας – Δέουσα εκτίμηση των επιπτώσεων στο περιβάλλον – Έκταση της υποχρεώσεως αιτιολογήσεως – Οδηγία 2011/92/ΕΕ – Εκτίμηση των επιπτώσεων ορισμένων σχεδίων έργων – Παράρτημα IV, σημείο 3 – Άρθρο 5, παράγραφος 3, στοιχείο δʹ – Περιεχόμενο της έννοιας “κύριες εναλλακτικές λύσεις”.#Υπόθεση C-461/17.
judgment · EL · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (втори състав) от 7 ноември 2018 г.#Brian Holohan и др. срещу An Bord Pleanála.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от High Court (Ирландия).#Преюдициално запитване — Околна среда — Директива 92/43/ЕИО — Опазване на естествените местообитания — Опазване на дивата флора и фауна — Проект за пътно строителство — Подходяща оценка на въздействието върху околната среда — Обхват на задължението за мотивиране — Директива 2011/92/ЕС — Оценка на въздействието на някои проекти — Приложение IV, точка 3 — Член 5, параграф 3, буква г) — Обхват на понятието „основни алтернативи.#Дело C-461/17.
judgment · BG · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Seconda Sezione) del 7 novembre 2018.#Brian Holohan e a. contro An Bord Pleanála.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dalla High Court (Irlande).#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Ambiente – Direttiva 92/43/CEE – Conservazione degli habitat naturali ‑ Conservazione della flora e della fauna selvatiche – Progetto di costruzione stradale – Opportuna valutazione dell’impatto ambientale – Portata dell’obbligo di motivazione – Direttiva 2011/92/UE – Valutazione dell’impatto di determinati progetti – Allegato IV, punto 3 – Articolo 5, paragrafo 3, lettera d) – Portata della nozione di “principali alternative”.#Causa C-461/17.
judgment · IT · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Tweede kamer) van 7 november 2018.#Brian Holohan e.a. tegen An Bord Pleanála.#Verzoek van de High Court (Ierland) om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Richtlijn 92/43/EEG – Instandhouding van de natuurlijke habitats – Instandhouding van de wilde flora en fauna – Wegenbouwproject – Passende milieueffectbeoordeling – Omvang van de motiveringsplicht – Richtlijn 2011/92/EU – Effectbeoordeling van bepaalde projecten – Bijlage IV, punt 3 – Artikel 5, lid 3, onder d) – Reikwijdte van het begrip voornaamste alternatieven.#Zaak C-461/17.
judgment · NL · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (drugo vijeće) od 7. studenoga 2018.#Brian Holohan i dr. protiv An Bord Pleanála.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio High Court (Irska).#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Okoliš – Direktiva 92/43/EEZ – Očuvanje prirodnih staništa – Očuvanje divlje faune i flore – Projekt izgradnje ceste – Odgovarajuća procjena učinaka na okoliš – Opseg obveze obrazlaganja – Direktiva 2011/92/EU – Procjena učinaka određenih projekata – Prilog IV. točka 3. – Članak 5. stavak 3. točka (d) – Doseg pojma ‚glavna alternativna rješenja’.#Predmet C-461/17.
judgment · HR · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 7 november 2018.#Brian Holohan m.fl. mot An Bord Pleanála.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från High Court (Irland).#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Miljö – Direktiv 92/43/EEG – Bevarande av livsmiljöer – Bevarande av vilda djur och växter – Vägbyggnadsprojekt – Lämplig miljökonsekvensbedömning – Omfattningen av motiveringsskyldigheten – Direktiv 2011/92/EU – Bedömning av vissa projekts inverkan – Bilaga IV, punkt 3 – Artikel 5.3 d – Räckvidd av begreppet ’huvudalternativ’.#Mål C-461/17.
judgment · SV · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (druhá komora) zo 7. novembra 2018.#Brian Holohan a i. proti An Bord Pleanála.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal High Court (Írsko).#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Životné prostredie – Smernica 92/43/EHS – Ochrana prirodzených biotopov – Ochrana voľne žijúcich živočíchov a rastlín – Projekt výstavby cestnej komunikácie – Primerané posudzovanie vplyvov na životné prostredie – Rozsah povinnosti odôvodnenia – Smernica 2011/92/EÚ – Posúdenie vplyvov určitých projektov – Príloha IV bod 3 – Článok 5 ods. 3 písm. d) – Rozsah pojmu ‚hlavné alternatívy‘.#Vec C-461/17.
judgment · SK · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 7. November 2018.#Brian Holohan u. a. gegen An Bord Pleanála.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des High Court (Irland).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Umwelt – Richtlinie 92/43/EWG – Erhaltung der natürlichen Lebensräume – Erhaltung der wildlebenden Tiere und Pflanzen – Straßenbauprojekt – Angemessene Prüfung der Umweltverträglichkeit – Umfang der Begründungspflicht – Richtlinie 2011/92/EU – Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung für bestimmte Projekte – Anhang IV Nr. 3 – Art. 5 Abs. 3 Buchst. d – Tragweite des Begriffs ‚wichtigste anderweitige Lösungsmöglichkeiten‘.#Rechtssache C-461/17.
judgment · DE · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 7. listopadu 2018.#Brian Holohan a další v. An Bord Pleanála.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná High Court (Irsko).#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Životní prostředí – Směrnice 92/43/EHS – Ochrana přírodních stanovišť – Ochrana volně žijících živočichů a planě rostoucích rostlin – Projekt silniční infrastruktury – Odpovídající posouzení vlivů na životní prostředí – Rozsah povinnosti uvést odůvodnění – Směrnice 2011/92/EU – Posuzování vlivů některých záměrů – Příloha IV bod 3 – Článek 5 odst. 3 písm. d) – Dosah pojmu ‚hlavní alternativní řešení‘.#Věc C-461/17.
judgment · CS · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (otrā palāta), 2018. gada 7. novembris.#Brian Holohan u.c. pret An Bord Pleanála.#High Court (Īrija) lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Vide – Direktīva 92/43/EEK – Dabisko dzīvotņu aizsardzība – Savvaļas faunas un floras aizsardzība – Ceļu būves projekts – Ietekmes uz vidi attiecīgs novērtējums – Pienākuma norādīt pamatojumu tvērums – Direktīva 2011/92/ES – Noteiktu projektu ietekmes novērtējums – IV pielikuma 3. punkts – 5. panta 3. punkta d) apakšpunkts – Jēdziena “galvenās alternatīvas” tvērums.#Lieta C-461/17.
judgment · LV · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 7 de novembro de 2018.#Brian Holohan e o. contra An Bord Pleanála.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pela High Court (Irlanda).#Reenvio prejudicial — Ambiente — Diretiva 92/43/CEE — Preservação dos habitats naturais — Preservação da fauna e da flora selvagens — Projeto de construção rodoviária — Avaliação adequada das incidências sobre o ambiente — Alcance do dever de fundamentação — Diretiva 2011/92/UE — Avaliação dos efeitos de determinados projetos — Anexo IV, n.o 3 — Artigo 5.o, n.o 3, alínea d) — Alcance do conceito de “principais soluções alternativas”.#Processo C-461/17.
judgment · PT · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 7 noiembrie 2018.#Brian Holohan ș.a. împotriva An Bord Pleanála.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de High Court (Irlanda).#Trimitere preliminară – Mediu – Directiva 92/43/CEE – Conservarea habitatelor naturale – Conservarea speciilor de faună și floră sălbatică – Proiect de construcție rutieră – Evaluare corespunzătoare a efectelor potențiale asupra mediului – Întinderea obligației de motivare – Directiva 2011/92/UE – Evaluarea efectelor anumitor proiecte – Anexa IV punctul 3 – Articolul 5 alineatul (3) litera (d) – Conținutul noțiunii „principalele alternative”.#Cauza C-461/17.
judgment · RO · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 7.11.2018.#Brian Holohan ym. vastaan An Bord Pleanála.#High Courtin (Irlanti) esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Ympäristö – Direktiivi 92/43/ETY – Luontotyyppien suojelu – Luonnonvaraisen eläimistön ja kasviston suojelu – Tienrakennushanke – Ympäristövaikutusten asianmukainen arviointi – Perusteluvelvollisuuden laajuus – Direktiivi 2011/92/EU – Tiettyjen hankkeiden vaikutusten arviointi – Liitteessä IV oleva 3 kohta – 5 artiklan 3 kohdan d alakohta – Käsitteen ”tärkeimmät vaihtoehdot” ulottuvuus.#Asia C-461/17.
judgment · FI · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
Translate to
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2018.#Brian Holohan and Others v An Bord Pleanála.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Conservation of wild fauna and flora — Road construction project — Appropriate assessment of effects on the environment — Extent of the obligation to state reasons — Directive 2011/92/EU — Assessment of the implications of certain projects — Annex IV, Point 3 — Article 5(3)(d) — Meaning of the concept of ‘main alternatives’.#Case C-461/17.
judgment · EN · 7 November 2018
View Download Open at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Vertaal naar
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.

Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0461
Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed3ceb90-e26f-11e8-b690-01aa75ed71a1
eurlex · 62017CJ0461 · source updated 7 November 2018