Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62017CJ0478

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#IQ v JP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 15 — Transfer to a court better placed to hear the case — Scope — Article 19 — Lis pendens.#Case C-478/17.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

4 October 2018

Last action

4 October 2018 · Decided

Status

decided

Sponsors

—

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 October 2018

Official sourceDownload fileView documentsShare

Records

Official record CELEX 62017CJ0478 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 4 October 2018. Status: decided.

Timeline

  1. 4 October 2018

    Decided

    Source: work_date_document

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Domstolens dom (femte avdelningen) av den 4 oktober 2018.#IQ mot JP.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Tribunalul Cluj.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Civilrättsligt samarbete – Behörighet att pröva frågor om föräldraansvar – Förordning (EG) nr 2201/2003 – Artikel 15 – Överföring till en domstol som är bättre lämpad att pröva målet – Tillämpningsområde – Artikel 19 – Litispendens.#Mål C-478/17.

View fileDownload file

Reading translation

Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Domstolens dom (femte avdelningen) av den 4 oktober 2018.#IQ mot JP.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Tribunalul Cluj.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Civilrättsligt samarbete – Behörighet att pröva frågor om föräldraansvar – Förordning (EG) nr 2201/2003 – Artikel 15 – Överföring till en domstol som är bättre lämpad att pröva målet – Tillämpningsområde – Artikel 19 – Litispendens.#Mål C-478/17.

    judgment · SV · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Hotărârea Curții (Camera a cincea) din 4 octombrie 2018.#IQ împotriva JP.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Tribunalul Cluj.#Trimitere preliminară – Cooperare judiciară în materie civilă – Competență în materia răspunderii părintești – Regulamentul (CE) nr. 2201/2003 – Articolul 15 – Trimitere la o instanță mai bine plasată pentru a soluționa cauza – Domeniu de aplicare – Articolul 19 – Litispendență.#Cauza C-478/17.

    judgment · RO · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Arrest van het Hof (Vijfde kamer) van 4 oktober 2018.#IQ tegen JP.#Verzoek van de Tribunal Cluj om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Justitiële samenwerking in burgerlijke zaken – Bevoegdheid inzake ouderlijke verantwoordelijkheid – Verordening (EG) nr. 2201/2003 – Artikel 15 – Verwijzing naar een gerecht dat beter in staat is de zaak te behandelen – Toepassingsgebied – Artikel 19 – Aanhangigheid.#Zaak C-478/17.

    judgment · NL · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (viides jaosto) 4.10.2018.#IQ vastaan JP.#Tribunalul Clujin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Oikeudellinen yhteistyö yksityisoikeudellisissa asioissa – Toimivalta vanhempainvastuuta koskevissa asioissa – Asetus (EY) N:o 2201/2003 – 15 artikla – Asian siirtäminen tuomioistuimeen, jolla on paremmat edellytykset asian käsittelyyn – Soveltamisala – 19 artikla – Vireilläolo.#Asia C-478/17.

    judgment · FI · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 4 octobre 2018.#IQ contre JP.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le Tribunalul Cluj.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence en matière de responsabilité parentale – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Article 15 – Renvoi à une juridiction mieux placée pour connaître de l’affaire – Champ d’application – Article 19 – Litispendance.#Affaire C-478/17.

    judgment · FR · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (πέμπτο τμήμα) της 4ης Οκτωβρίου 2018.#IQ κατά JP.#Αίτηση του Tribunalul Cluj για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Δικαστική συνεργασία σε αστικές υποθέσεις – Διεθνής δικαιοδοσία σε διαφορές γονικής μέριμνας – Κανονισμός (ΕΚ) 2201/2003 – Άρθρο 15 – Παραπομπή σε δικαστήριο που είναι σε θέση να κρίνει καλύτερα την υπόθεση – Πεδίο εφαρμογής – Άρθρο 19 – Εκκρεμοδικία.#Υπόθεση C-478/17.

    judgment · EL · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Quinta Secção) de 4 de outubro de 2018.#IQ contra JP.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo Tribunalul Cluj.#Reenvio prejudicial — Cooperação judiciária em matéria civil — Competência em matéria de responsabilidade parental — Regulamento (CE) n.o 2201/2003 — Artigo 15.o — Transferência para um tribunal mais bem colocado para apreciar a ação — Âmbito de aplicação — Artigo 19.o — Litispendência.#Processo C-478/17.

    judgment · PT · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Il-Ħames Awla) tal-4 ta’ Ottubru 2018.#IQ vs JP.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mit-Tribunalul Cluj.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Kooperazzjoni ġudizzjarja f’materji ċivili – Ġurisdizzjoni fil-qasam tar-responsabbiltà tal-ġenituri – Regolament (KE) Nru 2201/2003 – Artikolu 15 – Trasferiment lil qorti f’pożizzjoni aħjar sabiex tieħu konjizzjoni tal-kawża – Kamp ta’ applikazzjoni – Artikolu 19 – Lis pendens.#Kawża C-478/17.

    judgment · MT · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Tiesas spriedums (piektā palāta), 2018. gada 4. oktobris.#IQ pret JP.#Tribunalul Cluj lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Tiesu iestāžu sadarbība civillietās – Jurisdikcija lietās par vecāku atbildību – Regula (EK) Nr. 2201/2003 – 15. pants – Lietas nodošana tiesai, kas ir piemērotāka tās izskatīšanai – Piemērošanas joma – 19. pants – Lis pendens.#Lieta C-478/17.

    judgment · LV · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Quinta) de 4 de octubre de 2018.#IQ contra JP.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Tribunalul Cluj.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Cooperación judicial en materia civil — Competencia en materia de responsabilidad parental — Reglamento (CE) n.o 2201/2003 — Artículo 15 — Remisión a un órgano jurisdiccional mejor situado para conocer del asunto — Ámbito de aplicación — Artículo 19 — Litispendencia.#Asunto C-478/17.

    judgment · ES · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Wyrok Trybunału (piąta izba) z dnia 4 października 2018 r.#IQ przeciwko JP.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Tribunalul Cluj.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Współpraca sądowa w sprawach cywilnych – Jurysdykcja w sprawach dotyczących odpowiedzialności rodzicielskiej – Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 2201/2003 – Artykuł 15 – Przekazanie sądowi lepiej umiejscowionemu dla osądzenia sprawy – Zakres stosowania – Artykuł 19 – Zawisłość sporu.#Sprawa C-478/17.

    judgment · PL · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (piata komora) zo 4. októbra 2018.#IQ proti JP.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Tribunalul Cluj.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Súdna spolupráca v občianskych veciach – Právomoc vo veciach rodičovských práv a povinností – Nariadenie (ES) č. 2201/2003 – Článok 15 – Postúpenie súdu, ktorý je vo vhodnejšej situácii na prejednanie veci – Pôsobnosť – Článok 19 – Prekážka začatého konania.#Vec C-478/17.

    judgment · SK · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Euroopa Kohtu otsus (viies koda), 4.10.2018.#IQ versus JP.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Tribunalul Cluj.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Õigusalane koostöö tsiviilasjades – Kohtualluvus vanemliku vastutusega seotud asjades – Määrus (EÜ) nr 2201/2003 – Artikkel 15 – Kohtuasja üleviimine kohtusse, kus on asja arutamiseks paremad võimalused – Kohaldamisala – Artikkel 19 – Samal ajal pooleli olevad kohtuasjad (lis pendens).#Kohtuasi C-478/17.

    judgment · ET · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Rozsudek Soudního dvora (pátého senátu) ze dne 4. října 2018.#IQ v. JP.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Tribunalul Cluj.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Soudní spolupráce v občanských věcech – Příslušnost ve věcech rodičovské zodpovědnosti – Nařízení (ES) č. 2201/2003 – Článek 15 – Postoupení věci soudu s lepšími předpoklady k jejímu projednání – Oblast působnosti – Článek 19 – Překážka věci zahájené.#Věc C-478/17.

    judgment · CS · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 4. oktobra 2018.#IQ proti JP.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Tribunalul Cluj.#Predhodno odločanje – Pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah – Pristojnost v sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo – Uredba (ES) št. 2201/2003 – Člen 15 – Prenos pristojnosti na sodišče, ki je bolj primerno za odločanje o zadevi – Področje uporabe – Člen 19 – Litispendenca.#Zadeva C-478/17.

    judgment · SL · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Решение на Съда (пети състав) от 4 октомври 2018 г.#IQ срещу JP.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Tribunalul Cluj.#Преюдициално запитване — Съдебно сътрудничество по граждански дела — Компетентност във връзка с родителската отговорност — Регламент (ЕО) № 2201/2003 — Член 15 — Прехвърляне в съд, който е по-подходящ за разглеждането на делото — Приложно поле — Член 19 — Висящ процес.#Дело C-478/17.

    judgment · BG · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • A Bíróság ítélete (ötödik tanács), 2018. október 4.#IQ kontra JP.#A Tribunalul Cluj (Románia) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – Polgári ügyekben folytatott igazságügyi együttműködés – Szülői felelősséggel kapcsolatos joghatóság – 2201/2003/EK rendelet – 15. cikk – Az ügy tárgyalására alkalmasabb bírósághoz való áttétel – Hatály – 19. cikk – Perfüggőség.#C-478/17. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 4. Oktober 2018.#IQ gegen JP.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Tribunalul Cluj.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Zuständigkeit auf dem Gebiet der elterlichen Verantwortung – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2201/2003 – Art. 15 – Verweisung an ein Gericht, das den Fall besser beurteilen kann – Anwendungsbereich – Art. 19 – Rechtshängigkeit.#Rechtssache C-478/17.

    judgment · DE · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • 2018 m. spalio 4 d. Teisingumo Teismo (penktoji kolegija) sprendimas.#IQ prieš JP.#Tribunalul Cluj prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Teismų bendradarbiavimas civilinėse bylose – Jurisdikcija bylose dėl tėvų pareigų – Reglamentas (EB) Nr. 2201/2003 – 15 straipsnis – Bylos perdavimas tinkamesniam ją nagrinėti teismui – Taikymo sritis – 19 straipsnis – Lis pendens.#Byla C-478/17.

    judgment · LT · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Presuda Suda (peto vijeće) od 4. listopada 2018.#IQ protiv JP.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Tribunalul Cluj.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Pravosudna suradnja u građanskim stvarima – Nadležnost u u stvarima povezanim s roditeljskom odgovornošću – Uredba (EZ) br. 2201/2003 – Članak 15. – Prijenos nadležnosti na sud koji je primjereniji za rješavanje – Područje primjene – Članak 19. – Litispendencija.#Predmet C-478/17.

    judgment · HR · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Sentenza della Corte (Quinta Sezione) del 4 ottobre 2018.#IQ contro JP.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Tribunalul Cluj.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Cooperazione giudiziaria in materia civile – Competenza in materia di responsabilità genitoriale – Regolamento (CE) n. 2201/2003 – Articolo 15 – Trasferimento delle competenze ad un’autorità giurisdizionale più adatta a trattare il caso – Ambito di applicazione – Articolo 19 – Litispendenza.#Causa C-478/17.

    judgment · IT · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Domstolens dom (Femte Afdeling) af 4. oktober 2018.#IQ mod JP.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Tribunalul Cluj.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – retligt samarbejde i civile sager – kompetence vedrørende forældreansvar – forordning (EF) nr. 2201/2003 – artikel 15 – henvisning til en ret, der er bedre egnet til at behandle sagen – anvendelsesområde – artikel 19 – litispendens.#Sag C-478/17.

    judgment · DA · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Reading translation

    Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.

    On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.

  • Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 October 2018.#IQ v JP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 15 — Transfer to a court better placed to hear the case — Scope — Article 19 — Lis pendens.#Case C-478/17.

    judgment · EN · 4 October 2018

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.