European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62017CJ0635
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Exclusions from the scope of the directive — Article 3(2)(c) — Exclusion of persons benefiting from subsidiary protection — Extension of the right to family reunification to those persons under national law — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 11(2) — Lack of official documentary evidence of the family relationship — Explanations regarded as insufficiently plausible — Obligations on the authorities of the Member States to take additional steps — Limits.#Case C-635/17.
Introduced
13 March 2019
Last action
13 March 2019 · Decided
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Immigration
Source updated
13 March 2019
Records
Official record CELEX 62017CJ0635 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 13 March 2019. Status: decided.
Timeline
13 March 2019
Decided
Source: work_date_document
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
23 official files
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 13 de março de 2019.#E. contra Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reenvio prejudicial — Espaço de liberdade, segurança e justiça — Política de imigração — Direito ao reagrupamento familiar — Diretiva 2003/86/CE — Exclusões do âmbito de aplicação da diretiva — Artigo 3.o, n.o 2, alínea c) — Exclusão dos beneficiários de proteção subsidiária — Extensão pelo direito nacional do direito ao reagrupamento familiar aos referidos beneficiários — Competência do Tribunal de Justiça — Artigo 11.o, n.o 2 — Falta de documentos oficiais que comprovem a relação familiar — Explicações consideradas pouco plausíveis — Obrigações que incumbem às autoridades dos Estados‑Membros de efetuar diligências complementares — Limites.#Processo C-635/17.
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Segunda Secção) de 13 de março de 2019.#E. contra Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Pedido de decisão prejudicial apresentado pelo rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reenvio prejudicial — Espaço de liberdade, segurança e justiça — Política de imigração — Direito ao reagrupamento familiar — Diretiva 2003/86/CE — Exclusões do âmbito de aplicação da diretiva — Artigo 3.o, n.o 2, alínea c) — Exclusão dos beneficiários de proteção subsidiária — Extensão pelo direito nacional do direito ao reagrupamento familiar aos referidos beneficiários — Competência do Tribunal de Justiça — Artigo 11.o, n.o 2 — Falta de documentos oficiais que comprovem a relação familiar — Explicações consideradas pouco plausíveis — Obrigações que incumbem às autoridades dos Estados‑Membros de efetuar diligências complementares — Limites.#Processo C-635/17.
judgment · PT · 13 March 2019
Unionin tuomioistuimen tuomio (toinen jaosto) 13.3.2019.#E. vastaan Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlemin esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.#Ennakkoratkaisupyyntö – Vapauden, turvallisuuden ja oikeuden alue – Maahanmuuttopolitiikka – Oikeus perheenyhdistämiseen – Direktiivi 2003/86/EY – Direktiivin soveltamisalan ulkopuolelle jättäminen – 3 artiklan 2 kohdan c alakohta – Toissijaista suojelua saavien henkilöiden jääminen soveltamisalan ulkopuolelle – Perheenyhdistämistä koskevan oikeuden ulottaminen kansallisessa oikeudessa koskemaan kyseisiä henkilöitä – Unionin tuomioistuimen toimivalta – 11 artiklan 2 kohta – Sukulaisuussuhteen osoittavien virallisten asiakirjojen puuttuminen – Selitykset, joiden uskottavuutta pidetään riittämättömänä – Jäsenvaltioiden viranomaisilla oleva velvollisuus toteuttaa lisätoimenpiteitä – Rajat.#Asia C-635/17.
judgment · FI · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Hotărârea Curții (Camera a doua) din 13 martie 2019.#E. împotriva Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Trimitere preliminară – Spațiul de libertate, securitate și justiție – Politica privind imigrarea – Dreptul la reîntregirea familiei – Directiva 2003/86/CE – Excluderi din domeniul de aplicare al directivei – Articolul 3 alineatul (2) litera (c) – Excluderea persoanelor care beneficiază de protecție subsidiară – Extinderea în temeiul dreptului național a dreptului la reîntregirea familiei pentru persoanele menționate – Competența Curții – Articolul 11 alineatul (2) – Lipsa documentelor justificative oficiale care să ateste legături de familie – Explicații considerate ca fiind insuficient de plauzibile – Obligații care incumbă autorităților statelor membre de a efectua demersuri suplimentare – Limite.#Cauza C-635/17.
judgment · RO · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora (druhá komora) z 13. marca 2019.#E. PROTI Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania, ktorý podal Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Návrh na začatie prejudiciálneho konania – Priestor slobody, bezpečnosti a spravodlivosti – Politika týkajúca sa prisťahovalectva – Právo na zlúčenie rodiny – Smernica 2003/86/ES – Vylúčenia z pôsobnosti smernice – Článok 3 ods. 2 písm. c) – Vylúčenie osôb s postavením doplnkovej ochrany – Rozšírenie práva na zlúčenie rodiny vnútroštátnym právom na uvedené osoby – Právomoc Súdneho dvora – Článok 11 ods. 2 – Neexistencia úradných písomných dôkazov potvrdzujúcich rodinné vzťahy – Vysvetlenia považované za nedostatočne hodnoverné – Povinnosti orgánov členských štátov podniknúť dodatočné kroky – Obmedzenia.#Vec C-635/17.
judgment · SK · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (andra avdelningen) av den 13 mars 2019.#E. mot Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande från Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Begäran om förhandsavgörande – Område med frihet, säkerhet och rättvisa – Invandringspolitik – Rätt till familjeåterförening – Direktiv 2003/86/EG – Undantag från direktivets tillämpningsområde – Artikel 3.2 c – Personer som åtnjuter alternativt skydd omfattas inte – Dessa personer tillerkänns rätt till familjeåterförening enligt nationell rätt – Domstolens behörighet – Artikel 11.2 – Offentliga handlingar som styrker familjeband saknas – Förklaringar som inte anses vara tillräckligt trovärdiga – Skyldigheter för medlemsstaternas myndigheter att vidta ytterligare åtgärder – Gränser.#Mål C-635/17.
judgment · SV · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Domstolens dom (Anden Afdeling) af 13. marts 2019.#E. mod Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Anmodning om præjudiciel afgørelse indgivet af Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Præjudiciel forelæggelse – område med frihed, sikkerhed og retfærdighed – indvandringspolitik – ret til familiesammenføring – direktiv 2003/86/EF – undtagelser fra direktivets anvendelsesområde – artikel 3, stk. 2, litra c) – undtagelse af personer med subsidiær beskyttelse – udvidelse af retten til familiesammenføring i national ret til at omfatte de nævnte personer – Domstolens kompetence – artikel 11, stk. 2 – manglende officiel dokumentation for familiemæssig tilknytning – forklaringer, der ikke anses for at være tilstrækkeligt plausible – forpligtelser for medlemsstaternes myndigheder til at foretage yderligere undersøgelser – grænser.#Sag C-635/17.
judgment · DA · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
2019 m. kovo 13 d. Teisingumo Teismo (antroji kolegija) sprendimas.#E. prieš Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą.#Prašymas priimti prejudicinį sprendimą – Laisvės, saugumo ir teisingumo erdvė – Imigracijos politika – Teisė į šeimos susijungimą – Direktyva 2003/86/EB – Neįtraukimas į direktyvos taikymo sritį – 3 straipsnio 2 dalies c punktas – Netaikymas asmenims, kuriems taikoma papildoma apsauga – Teisės į šeimos susijungimą išplėtimas minėtiems asmenims pagal nacionalinę teisę – Teisingumo Teismo jurisdikcija – 11 straipsnio 2 dalis – Oficialių dokumentinių įrodymų, patvirtinančių šeimos santykius, nebuvimas – Nepakankamai įtikimi paaiškinimai – Valstybių narių tarnyboms tenkančios pareigos imtis papildomų veiksmų – Ribos.#Byla C-635/17.
judgment · LT · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Euroopa Kohtu otsus (teine koda), 13.3.2019.#E. versus Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Eelotsusetaotlus, mille on esitanud Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Eelotsusetaotlus – Vabadusel, turvalisusel ja õigusel rajanev ala – Sisserändepoliitika – Perekonna taasühinemise õigus – Direktiiv 2003/86/EÜ – Väljajätmine direktiivi kohaldamisalast – Artikli 3 lõike 2 punkt c – Täiendava kaitse saajate väljajätmine – Perekonna taasühinemise õiguse laiendamine nendele isikutele riigisisese õigusega – Euroopa Kohtu pädevus – Artikli 11 lõige 2 – Peresuhet tõendavate ametlike dokumentide puudumine – Selgitused, mida ei peeta piisavalt usutavaks – Liikmesriikide ametiasutuste kohustus teha täiendavad toimingud – Piirid.#Kohtuasi C-635/17.
judgment · ET · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 13. marca 2019.#E. proti Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Predhodno odločanje – Območje svobode, varnosti in pravice – Politika priseljevanja – Pravica do združitve družine – Direktiva 2003/86/ES – Izključitve iz področja uporabe direktive – Člen 3(2)(c) – Izključitev oseb, ki so upravičene do subsidiarne zaščite – Razširitev pravice do združitve družine na navedene osebe z nacionalnim pravom – Pristojnost Sodišča – Člen 11(2) – Neobstoj uradnih listinskih dokazov o družinskem razmerju – Pojasnila, ki se ne štejejo za dovolj verjetna – Obveznost organov držav članic, da izvedejo dodatne poizvedbe – Meje.#Zadeva C-635/17.
judgment · SL · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (It-Tieni Awla) tat-13 ta’ Marzu 2019.#E vs Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mir-Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Rinviju għal deċiżjoni preliminari – Kontrolli fil-fruntieri, ażil u immigrazzjoni – Politika tal-immigrazzjoni – Dritt għar-riunifikazzjoni tal-familja – Direttiva 2003/86/KE – Esklużjonijiet mill-kamp ta’ applikazzjoni tad-direttiva – Artikolu 3(2)(c) – Esklużjoni ta’ persuni li jibbenefikaw minn protezzjoni sussidjarja – Estensjoni mid-dritt nazzjonali tad-dritt għar-riunifikazzjoni tal-familja lil dawn il-persuni – Ġurisdizzjoni tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Artikolu 11(2) – Assenza ta’ dokumenti ta’ sostenn uffiċjali li jattestaw rabtiet tal-familja – Spjegazzjonijiet ikkunsidrati bħala mhux suffiċjentement plawżibbli – Obbligi tal-awtoritajiet tal-Istati Membri li jwettqu l-passi ulterjuri kollha – Limiti.#Kawża C-635/17.
judgment · MT · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentenza della Corte (Seconda Sezione) del 13 marzo 2019.#E. contro Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Rinvio pregiudiziale – Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia – Politica relativa all’immigrazione – Diritto al ricongiungimento familiare – Direttiva 2003/86/CE – Esclusioni dall’ambito di applicazione della direttiva – Articolo 3, paragrafo 2, lettera c) – Esclusione delle persone beneficiarie di protezione sussidiaria – Estensione a tali persone del diritto al ricongiungimento familiare operata dal diritto nazionale – Competenza della Corte – Articolo 11, paragrafo 2 – Assenza di documenti ufficiali che comprovano vincoli familiari – Spiegazioni ritenute non sufficientemente plausibili – Obblighi delle autorità degli Stati membri di svolgere ulteriori indagini – Limiti.#Causa C-635/17.
judgment · IT · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Wyrok Trybunału (druga izba) z dnia 13 marca 2019 r.#E. przeciwko Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Przestrzeń wolności, bezpieczeństwa i sprawiedliwości – Polityka imigracyjna – Prawo do łączenia rodzin – Dyrektywa 2003/86/WE – Wyłączenia z zakresu stosowania dyrektywy – Artykuł 3 ust. 2 lit. c) – Wyłączenie osób kwalifikujących się do ochrony uzupełniającej – Rozszerzenie przez przepisy krajowe zakresu prawa do łączenia rodzin poprzez objęcie nim wspomnianych osób – Właściwość Trybunału – Artykuł 11 ust. 2 – Brak dokumentów urzędowych potwierdzających istnienie więzi rodzinnych – Wyjaśnienia uznane za niewystarczająco wiarygodne – Ciążący na władzach państw członkowskich obowiązek podjęcia dodatkowych działań – Granice.#Sprawa C-635/17.
judgment · PL · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Решение на Съда (втори състав) от 13 март 2019 г.#E. срещу Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Преюдициално запитване, отправено от Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Преюдициално запитване — Пространство на свобода, сигурност и правосъдие — Политика относно имиграцията — Право на събиране на семейството — Директива 2003/86/ЕО — Изключване от приложното поле на Директивата — Член 3, параграф 2, буква в) — Изключване на лицата с право на субсидиарна закрила — Разширяване посредством националното законодателство на обхвата на правото на събиране на семейството по отношение на посочените лица — Компетентност на Съда — Член 11, параграф 2 — Липса на официални документни доказателства за семейната връзка — Обяснения, считани за недостатъчно убедителни — Задължения на органите на държавите членки да предприемат допълнителни действия — Граници.#Дело C-635/17.
judgment · BG · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Rozsudek Soudního dvora (druhého senátu) ze dne 13. března 2019.#E. v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce podaná Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Prostor svobody, bezpečnosti a práva – Přistěhovalecká politika – Právo na sloučení rodiny – Směrnice 2003/86 – Vyloučení z působnosti směrnice – Článek 3 odst. 2 písm. c). – Vyloučení osob požívajících doplňkové ochrany – Rozšíření práva na sloučení rodiny na uvedené osoby na základě vnitrostátního práva – Pravomoc Soudního dvora – Článek 11 odst. 2 – Nepředložení úředních dokladů, které by prokázaly rodinné vztahy – Vysvětlení považovaná za nedostatečně věrohodná – Povinnosti orgánů členských států provést doplňující opatření – Meze.#Věc C-635/17.
judgment · CS · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Presuda Suda (drugo vijeće) od 13. ožujka 2019.#E. protiv Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku koji je uputio Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Područje slobode, sigurnosti i pravde – Politika u vezi s imigracijom – Pravo na spajanje obitelji – Direktiva 2003/86/EZ – Isključenja područja primjene Direktive – Članak 3. stavak 2. točka (c) – Isključenje osoba koje imaju pravo na supsidijarnu zaštitu – Proširenje prava na spajanje obitelji navedenim osobama nacionalnim pravom – Nadležnost Suda – Članak 11. stavak 2. – Pomanjkanje službenih dokumentacijskih dokaza o obiteljskom odnosu – Objašnjenja koja se smatraju nedovoljno uvjerljivima – Obveze tijela država članica da poduzmu dodatne korake – Granice.#Predmet C-635/17.
judgment · HR · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 13. März 2019.#E. gegen Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen der Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts – Einwanderungspolitik – Recht auf Familienzusammenführung – Richtlinie 2003/86/EG – Ausnahmen vom Anwendungsbereich der Richtlinie – Art. 3 Abs. 2 Buchst. c – Ausschluss subsidiär schutzberechtigter Personen – Erstreckung des Rechts auf Familienzusammenführung auf diese Personen aufgrund nationalen Rechts – Zuständigkeit des Gerichtshofs – Art. 11 Abs. 2 – Fehlen amtlicher Unterlagen zum Nachweis familiärer Bindungen – Für nicht hinreichend plausibel befundene Erklärungen – Den Behörden der Mitgliedstaaten obliegende Verpflichtungen zur Durchführung ergänzender Maßnahmen – Grenzen.#Rechtssache C-635/17.
judgment · DE · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
A Bíróság ítélete (második tanács), 2019. március 13.#E. kontra Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#A Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem (Hollandia) által benyújtott előzetes döntéshozatal iránti kérelem.#Előzetes döntéshozatal – A szabadságon, a biztonságon és a jog érvényesülésén alapuló térség – Bevándorlási politika – Családegyesítési jog – 2003/86/EK irányelv – Az irányelv hatálya alól történő kizárások – A 3. cikk (2) bekezdésének c) pontja – Kiegészítő védelmi jogállással rendelkező személyek kizárása – A családegyesítéshez való jog említett személyekre való kiterjesztése a nemzeti jog által – A Bíróság hatásköre – A 11. cikk (2) bekezdése – Családi kapcsolatot igazoló hivatalos okmányok hiánya – Nem kellően hihetőnek minősített magyarázatok – A tagállami hatóságok kötelezettségei további lépések megtételére – Korlátok.#C-635/17. sz. ügy.
judgment · HU · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Tiesas spriedums (otrā palāta), 2019. gada 13. marts.#E. pret Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu.#Lūgums sniegt prejudiciālu nolēmumu – Brīvības, drošības un tiesiskuma telpa – Imigrācijas politika – Tiesības uz ģimenes atkalapvienošanos – Direktīva 2003/86/EK – Izslēgšana no direktīvas piemērošanas jomas – 3. panta 2. punkta c) apakšpunkts – Personu, kas saņem alternatīvu aizsardzību, izslēgšana – Tiesību uz ģimenes atkalapvienošanos attiecināšana uz šīm personām ar valsts tiesību aktiem – Tiesas kompetence – 11. panta 2. punkts – Oficiālu dokumentāru pierādījumu, ar kuriem tiek pierādītas ģimenes saites, neesamība – Paskaidrojumi, kas uzskatāmi par nepietiekami ticamiem – Dalībvalstu iestāžu pienākumi veikt papildu pasākumus – Robežas.#Lieta C-635/17.
judgment · LV · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Segunda) de 13 de marzo de 2019.#E. contra Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia — Política de inmigración — Derecho a la reagrupación familiar — Directiva 2003/86/CE — Exclusiones del ámbito de aplicación de la Directiva — Artículo 3, apartado 2, letra c) — Exclusión de las personas beneficiarias de protección subsidiaria — Extensión por parte del Derecho nacional del derecho a la reagrupación familiar a dichas personas — Competencia del Tribunal de Justicia — Artículo 11, apartado 2 — Falta de documentos justificativos oficiales que acrediten los vínculos familiares — Explicaciones no consideradas suficientemente verosímiles — Obligaciones de las autoridades de los Estados miembros de llevar a cabo diligencias adicionales — Límites.#Asunto C-635/17.
judgment · ES · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (δεύτερο τμήμα) της 13ης Μαρτίου 2019.#E. κατά Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Αίτηση του Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem για την έκδοση προδικαστικής αποφάσεως.#Προδικαστική παραπομπή – Χώρος ελευθερίας, ασφάλειας και δικαιοσύνης – Μεταναστευτική πολιτική – Δικαίωμα οικογενειακής επανένωσης – Οδηγία 2003/86/ΕΚ – Εξαιρέσεις από το πεδίο εφαρμογής της οδηγίας – Άρθρο 3, παράγραφος 2, στοιχείο γʹ – Αποκλεισμός δικαιούχων επικουρικής προστασίας – Επέκταση του δικαιώματος οικογενειακής επανένωσης στα εν λόγω πρόσωπα βάσει του εθνικού δικαίου – Αρμοδιότητα του Δικαστηρίου – Άρθρο 11, παράγραφος 2 – Έλλειψη επίσημων δικαιολογητικών που να βεβαιώνουν τους οικογενειακούς δεσμούς – Εξηγήσεις θεωρούμενες μη πειστικές – Υποχρεώσεις των αρχών των κρατών μελών να προβαίνουν σε συμπληρωματικές ενέργειες – Όρια.#Υπόθεση C-635/17.
judgment · EL · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrest van het Hof (Tweede kamer) van 13 maart 2019.#E. tegen Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Verzoek van de rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem, om een prejudiciële beslissing.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Ruimte van vrijheid, veiligheid en recht – Immigratiebeleid – Recht op gezinshereniging – Richtlijn 2003/86/EG – Uitsluitingen van de werkingssfeer van de richtlijn – Artikel 3, lid 2, onder c) – Uitsluiting van subsidiair beschermden – Uitbreiding door het nationale recht van het recht op gezinshereniging tot die personen – Bevoegdheid van het Hof – Artikel 11, lid 2 – Ontbreken van officiële bewijsstukken waaruit de gezinsband blijkt – Gegeven uitleg onvoldoende plausibel geacht – Op de autoriteiten van de lidstaten rustende verplichtingen om aanvullende stappen te ondernemen – Grenzen.#Zaak C-635/17.
judgment · NL · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 13 mars 2019.#E. contre Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Demande de décision préjudicielle, introduite par le rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique relative à l’immigration – Droit au regroupement familial – Directive 2003/86/CE – Exclusions du champ d’application de la directive – Article 3, paragraphe 2, sous c) – Exclusion des personnes bénéficiaires d’une protection subsidiaire – Extension par le droit national du droit au regroupement familial auxdites personnes – Compétence de la Cour – Article 11, paragraphe 2 – Absence de pièces justificatives officielles attestant des liens familiaux – Explications considérées comme étant insuffisamment plausibles – Obligations incombant aux autorités des États membres d’effectuer des démarches complémentaires – Limites.#Affaire C-635/17.
judgment · FR · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Reading translation
Translate this document into your language. PoliticalRepo does not store a separate copy per EU language.
On-demand whole-document translation with a downloadable PDF (logo + link to the official source). The official file stays authoritative.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2019.#E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Exclusions from the scope of the directive — Article 3(2)(c) — Exclusion of persons benefiting from subsidiary protection — Extension of the right to family reunification to those persons under national law — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 11(2) — Lack of official documentary evidence of the family relationship — Explanations regarded as insufficiently plausible — Obligations on the authorities of the Member States to take additional steps — Limits.#Case C-635/17.
judgment · EN · 13 March 2019
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- · CJ · Court of Justice of the European Union
- · efbe2eef-8e65-4b47-ba73-ac0f0541c9a4 · efbe2eef-8e65-4b47-ba73-ac0f0541c9a4
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0635
- Open data entity: http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af2799f2-457c-11e9-a8ed-01aa75ed71a1
- eurlex · 62017CJ0635 · source updated 13 March 2019