PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62017CJ0680_SUM

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Sumanan Vethanayagam and Others v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Community Visa Code – Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 – Article 5 – Member State competent to examine and decide on a visa application – Article 8 – Representation agreement – Article 32(3) – Appeal against a refusal decision visa – Member State competent to rule on the appeal in the event of a representation agreement – ​​Holders of the right to lodge an appeal.#Case C-680/17.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· FR

Introduced

29 July 2019

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

29 July 2019

Records

Official record CELEX 62017CJ0680_SUM from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 29 July 2019. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

  • Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 29 juillet 2019.#Sumanan Vethanayagam e.a. contre Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Code communautaire des visas – Règlement (CE) no 810/2009 – Article 5 – État membre compétent pour examiner une demande de visa et se prononcer sur elle – Article 8 – Accord de représentation – Article 32, paragraphe 3 – Recours contre une décision de refus de visa – État membre compétent pour statuer sur le recours en cas d’accord de représentation – Titulaires du droit d’introduire un recours.#Affaire C-680/17.

    judgment · FR · 29 July 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.