PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CO

CELEX 62017CO0233(02)_INF

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV OST.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· EN

Introduced

2 May 2019

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 May 2019

Records

Official record CELEX 62017CO0233(02)_INF from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 2 May 2019. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

23 official files

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV OST.

View fileDownload file

  • Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · EN · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Domstolens beslut (fjärde avdelningen) av den 2 maj 2019.#GX mot kommissionen.#Artikel 155 i domstolens rättegångsregler – Underlåtenhet att pröva begäran om resning – Föreligger inte.#Mål C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · SV · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Sklep Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 2. maja 2019.#GX proti Evropski komisiji.#Člen 155 Poslovnika Sodišča – Neodločitev o predlogu za obnovo postopka – Neobstoj.#Zadeva C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · SL · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonanța Curții (Camera a patra) din 2 mai 2019.#GX împotriva Comisiei Europene.#Articolul 155 din Regulamentul de procedură al Curții – Omisiune de a statua asupra cererii de revizuire – Lipsă.#Cauza C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · RO · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Despacho do Tribunal de Justiça (Quarta Secção) de 2 de maio de 2019.#GX contra Comissão Europeia.#Artigo 155.° do Regulamento de Processo do Tribunal de Justiça — Não conhecimento do pedido de revisão — Inexistência.#Processo C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · PT · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Beschikking van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 2 mei 2019.#GX tegen Europese Commissie.#Artikel 155 van het Reglement voor de procesvoering van het Hof – Verzuim om uitspraak te doen op het verzoek om herziening – Geen.#Zaak C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · NL · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Digriet tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja (Ir-Raba' Awla) tat-2 ta’ Mejju 2019.#GX vs Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea.#Artikolu 155 tar-Regoli tal-Proċedura tal-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja – Nuqqas li tingħata deċiżjoni fuq it-talba għal reviżjoni – Assenza.#Kawża C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · MT · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Tiesas (ceturtā palāta) rīkojums, 2019. gada 2. maijs.#GX pret Eiropas Komisiju.#Tiesas Reglamenta 155. pants – Nelemšana par pieteikumu pārskatīt lēmumu – Neesamība.#Lieta C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · LV · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Rješenje Suda (četvrto vijeće) od 2. svibnja 2019.#GX protiv Europske komisije.#Članak 155. Poslovnika Suda – Propust odlučivanja o zahtjevu za ponavljanje postupka – Nepostojanje.#Predmet C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · HR · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Unionin tuomioistuimen määräys (neljäs jaosto) 2.5.2019.#GX vastaan Euroopan komissio.#Unionin tuomioistuimen työjärjestyksen 155 artikla – Purkamishakemuksesta ei ole jätetty lausumatta.#Asia C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · FI · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Euroopa Kohtu määrus (neljas koda), 2.5.2019.#GX versus Euroopa Komisjon.#Euroopa Kohtu kodukorra artikkel 155 – Teistmistaotluse kohta otsuse tegemata jätmine – Puudumine.#Kohtuasi C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · ET · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Διάταξη του Δικαστηρίου (τέταρτο τμήμα) της 2ας Μαΐου 2019.##Άρθρο 155 του Κανονισμού Διαδικασίας του Δικαστηρίου – Παράλειψη του Δικαστηρίου να αποφανθεί επί της αιτήσεως αναθεωρήσεως – Δεν υφίσταται.#Υπόθεση C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · EL · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 2. Mai 2019.#GX gegen Europäische Kommission.#Art. 155 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Unterlassen einer Entscheidung über einen Wiederaufnahmeantrag – Fehlen.#Rechtssache C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · DE · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Usnesení Soudního dvora (čtvrtého senátu) ze dne 2. května 2019.#GX v. Evropská komise.#Článek 155 jednacího řádu Soudního dvora – Chybějící rozhodnutí o návrhu na obnovu řízení – Neexistence.#Věc C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · CS · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Определение на Съда (четвърти състав) от 2 май 2019 г.#GX срещу Европейска комисия.#Член 155 от Процедурния правилник на Съда — Пропуск при произнасяне по молба за отмяна на влязъл в сила съдебен акт — Липса.#Дело C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · BG · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Uznesenie Súdneho dvora (štvrtá komora) z 2. mája 2019.#GX proti Európskej komisii.#Článok 155 Rokovacieho poriadku Súdneho dvora – Návrh na doplnenie rozhodnutia, pokiaľ ide o obnovu konania – Neexistencia.#Vec C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · SK · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • 2019 m. gegužės 2 d. Teisingumo Teismo (ketvirtoji kolegija) nutartis.#GX prieš Europos Komisiją.#Teisingumo Teismo procedūros reglamento 155 straipsnis – Sprendimo nepriėmimas dėl prašymo atnaujinti bylą – Nebuvimas.#Byla C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · LT · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordinanza della Corte (Quarta Sezione) del 2 maggio 2019.#GX contro Commissione europea.#Articolo 155 del regolamento di procedura della Corte – Omessa statuizione sulla domanda di revocazione – Insussistenza.#Causa C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · IT · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • A Bíróság végzése (negyedik tanács), 2019. május 2.##A Bíróság eljárási szabályzatának 155. cikke – A perújítási kérelemről való határozathozatal elmulasztása – Hiány.#C-233/17 P-REV OST. sz. ügy.

    judgment · HU · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Auto del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Cuarta) de 2 de mayo de 2019.#GX contre Comisión Europea.#Artículo 155 del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia — Omisión de pronunciamiento sobre la pretensión de revisión — Inexistencia.#Asunto C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · ES · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Domstolens kendelse (Fjerde Afdeling) af 2. maj 2019.#GX mod Europa-Kommissionen.#Artikel 155 i Domstolens procesreglement – undladelse af at træffe afgørelse om begæringen om genoptagelse – foreligger ikke.#Sag C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · DA · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Postanowienie Trybunału (czwarta izba) z dnia 2 maja 2019 r.##Artykuł 155 regulaminu postępowania przed Trybunałem – Pominięcie rozstrzygnięcia w odniesieniu do skargi o wznowienie postępowania – Brak.#Sprawa C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · PL · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Ordonnance de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 mai 2019.#GX contre Commission européenne.#Article 155 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Omission de statuer sur la demande en révision – Absence.#Affaire C-233/17 P-REV OST.

    judgment · FR · 2 May 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.