PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

European Union · Record · CJ

CELEX 62018CJ0202

Judgment of the court (upper chamber), February 26, 2019. #Ilmārs Rimšēvičs v. Republic of Latvia. #European Central Banking System - Claim based on the Statute of the European Central Banking System and the European Central Bank 14.2. violation of the second part of the article - the decision of the state institution by which the head of the state central bank has been removed from office. #Case C-202/18.

decidedEuropean Union· Court of Justice of the European Union· LV

Introduced

26 February 2019

Last action

Status

decided

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

26 February 2019

Records

Official record CELEX 62018CJ0202 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 26 February 2019. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Tiesas spriedums (virspalāta), 2019. gada 26. februāris.#Ilmārs Rimšēvičs pret Latvijas Republika.#Eiropas Centrālo banku sistēma – Prasība, kas pamatota ar Eiropas Centrālo banku sistēmas un Eiropas Centrālās bankas statūtu 14.2. panta otrās daļas pārkāpumu – Valsts iestādes lēmums, ar kuru valsts centrālās bankas vadītājs ir atstādināts no amata.#Lieta C-202/18.

View fileDownload file

  • Tiesas spriedums (virspalāta), 2019. gada 26. februāris.#Ilmārs Rimšēvičs pret Latvijas Republika.#Eiropas Centrālo banku sistēma – Prasība, kas pamatota ar Eiropas Centrālo banku sistēmas un Eiropas Centrālās bankas statūtu 14.2. panta otrās daļas pārkāpumu – Valsts iestādes lēmums, ar kuru valsts centrālās bankas vadītājs ir atstādināts no amata.#Lieta C-202/18.

    judgment · LV · 26 February 2019

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.