European Union · Record · CJ
CELEX 62018CJ0366
Judgment of the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) of September 18, 2019.#José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero against UTE Luz Madrid Centro (made up of the companies SICE SA, URBALUX SA IMESAPI SA EXTRALUX SA and CITELUM IBÉRICA SA).#Preliminary ruling procedure — Social policy — Directive 2010/18/EU — Revised framework agreement on parental leave — National regulations that makes the granting of parental leave subject to a reduction in working hours work, with a proportional decrease in salary — Shift work with a variable schedule — Request by the worker to carry out his work with a fixed schedule in order to take care of his minor children — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal opportunities and equal treatment between men and women in matters of employment and occupation — Indirect discrimination — Partial inadmissibility.#Case C-366/18.
Introduced
18 September 2019
Last action
—
Status
decided
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
18 September 2019
Records
Official record CELEX 62018CJ0366 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 18 September 2019. Status: decided.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Sexta) de 18 de septiembre de 2019.#José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero contra UTE Luz Madrid Centro (integrada por las mercantiles SICE SA, URBALUX SA IMESAPI SA EXTRALUX SA y CITELUM IBÉRICA SA).#Procedimiento prejudicial — Política social — Directiva 2010/18/UE — Acuerdo marco revisado sobre el permiso parental — Normativa nacional que supedita la concesión del permiso parental a la reducción de la jornada laboral, con una disminución proporcional del salario — Trabajo a turnos con un horario variable — Solicitud del trabajador para realizar su trabajo con un horario fijo a fin de ocuparse de sus hijos menores de edad — Directiva 2006/54/CE — Igualdad de oportunidades e igualdad de trato entre hombres y mujeres en asuntos de empleo y ocupación — Discriminación indirecta — Inadmisibilidad parcial.#Asunto C-366/18.
judgment · ES · 18 September 2019
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.