Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of June 26, 2019.#Aleš Kuhar and Jožef Kuhar v. Addiko Bank d.d.#Preliminary ruling - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 93/13/EEC - Procedure for enforcement of a claim secured by a mortgage - Directly enforceable notarial document - Judicial control over unfair terms - Postponement of enforcement - Lack of jurisdiction of the court that decides on the proposal for enforcement - Consumer protection - Principle of effectiveness - Compliant explanation.#Case C-407/18.

Records

Official record CELEX 62018CJ0407 from European Union at Court of Justice of the European Union. Dated 26 June 2019. Status: decided.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Sodba Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 26. junija 2019.#Aleš Kuhar in Jožef Kuhar proti Addiko Bank d.d.#Predhodno odločanje – Nepošteni pogoji v potrošniških pogodbah – Direktiva 93/13/EGS – Postopek izvršbe s hipoteko zavarovane terjatve – Neposredno izvršljiv notarski zapis – Sodni nadzor nad nepoštenimi pogoji – Odlog izvršbe – Nepristojnost sodišča, ki odloča o predlogu za izvršbo – Varstvo potrošnikov – Načelo učinkovitosti – Skladna razlaga.#Zadeva C-407/18.

  judgment · SL · 26 June 2019

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.